An Interview with Ray Comfort about “180″

The pro-life community has been buzzing for a week now about the “180″ documentary. If you haven’t seen it yet, you can watch it for free at 180Movie.com. I had the opportunity to interview Ray Comfort, the author and filmmaker behind “180,” to ask him some questions about the movie. You can listen to the full audio interview (12 minutes) by clicking here, or you can read the transcript below.

Josh Brahm: Ray, how did you come up with the idea for “180?”

Ray Comfort

Ray Comfort: Well, I was – actually it wasn’t planned. I wrote a book called Hitler, God and the Bible and told the publishers, WorldNetDaily, that I was going to create a video called Hitler’s Religion and go with it, took part of the manuscript and made it into a TV script and found it was just too big, too long, and too confusing and I actually gave up. I said, “Look, I’m taking a camera out in the streets to find out what people believe about Hitler” and we just abandoned the script. And I came back with 14 interviews of people who didn’t know who Hitler was. That really, really blew me away. And then I bumped into a guy named Steve who was a neo-Nazi, black-hating, Jew-hating, Hitler-loving, America-hating atheist who had a 14-inch blue Mohawk and that was very colorful footage. And then I was heckled by a German neo-Nazi, Jew-hater and we managed to get him on a hidden camera and a hidden microphone and then I bumped into a Russian Jew who happened to have lost his relatives in the Holocaust.

So, all this was totally unplanned and I looked at the footage and I go, “What have we got here? This is quite amazing.” And as I went through the Holocaust, I read about some Jews that were shot by the Nazis, pushed into a mass grave and then [the Nazi’s] brought in bulldozers and buried them while some of them were still alive and that horrified me so I decided to go out and test people’s moral character by asking if they had at gunpoint would bury Jews alive. And people would say, “No, no, I wouldn’t. I would never do that. I could never do that.” And I say, “Well, you’re a compassionate person.” They’d say, “Yes, I’m very compassionate.” I say, “How do you feel about abortion?” And they’d say, “It’s a woman’s choice.” So I’d reason with them and I’d ask them one question and it greatly surprised me but the question made them change their minds about abortion. It was in seconds and so we sat back and thought, “Boy, this is not a video about Hitler at all. This is a pro-life video.” So we changed the name to “180.”

Josh Brahm: Let me ask you about something you just said. You said there was hidden camera footage in the movie?

Ray Comfort: Oh, yeah, yeah. The guy that had got the blurred – have you watched it?

Josh Brahm: Yes, twice now.

Ray Comfort: The German guy that had a blurred face. We used a hidden camera and hidden microphone for him, and he actually called the ministry this morning very angry, not that we’d filmed him. He didn’t mind being on the film. He just said we’d misrepresented what he – Christianity. That’s what he was mad. He wanted us to have his Nazi views. So yeah, there was hidden camera footage and I think it’s exciting as long as you hide somebody’s face and leave their identity out, it’s quite legal to do so.

Josh Brahm: Okay. That’s what I was wondering ‘cause again all I know is that California’s a two-party state and I wasn’t exactly sure what the laws were on that.

Ray Comfort: Yeah, as long as you blur their face.

Josh Brahm: What are you hoping to accomplish with the film?

Ray Comfort: We want to change people’s minds about the horror of abortion that it’s not right to kill children in the womb. We’re like living in Nazi Germany in 1940. We have what’s called the American Holocaust by many, 50 million Americans being killed by people who think they can choose to kill babies in the womb and we want to put a stop to that.

Josh Brahm: Now you often compare abortion to the Holocaust and a lot of pro-lifers do this. Ray, tell me how you respond to people like Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel, who doesn’t believe that abortion and Holocaust are comparable?

Ray Comfort: That would be because he doesn’t believe that it’s a baby in the womb but science has told us. Now we know. We’re without ignorance any longer that at six weeks, six days a baby in the womb has a mouth and has hands and has eyes. It’s got a heartbeat. It’s a living person within the womb and if you redefine Jew as being non-human, it justifies the murder of Jews en masse. Now if you redefine what’s in a woman’s womb as being not human then you may do so and take the life of it.

But God highly prices human life. If you look at Genesis 9:6 of the Jewish scriptures, you’ll see that God says if you take the life of another human being, if you spill their blood, your blood will be spilled.  In other words, you’ll give your life for it. Capital punishment.

And then it says, “For he is made in the image of God.” Man is not like an animal. He’s not a beast. You can’t murder a horse or a dog or a cat. That word ‘murder’ is reserved for human beings. And that’s because God highly prizes human beings above the animals and if you take the life of someone, you lose your life because their life is valued.

So when you take the life of a baby in the womb, then you are murdering them according to God’s book and you’re responsible and this is something that should horrify every one of us including survivors of the Holocaust.

Josh Brahm: What percentage of people interviewed, not just shown on the movie but interviewed, changed their minds on abortion?

Ray Comfort: Oh, boy, I couldn’t try to put it out. 50-60%? Because I didn’t interview anyone that was pro-life. I didn’t want to change their minds on that and I just find out if someone’s pro-abortion. So, most people I interviewed, they changed their mind and then we put people that just said, “No, you’re never going to change my mind.” One lady who was gay, she’s homosexual, she wouldn’t change her mind at all. Another couple that were there said, “You would never change my mind about abortion. My mind is made up. It’s wrong. I wouldn’t do it myself but I think that a woman should have the right to choose to kill a baby in her womb if she so desires.”

Josh Brahm: You know I do a lot of work with Justice For All and we go out and we train pro-life people to dialogue with pro-choice people about abortion in the most effective ways possible. Would you encourage other pro-life advocates to use hypothetical situations the way that you did when talking to pro-choice people?

Ray Comfort: Absolutely. If you want to change people’s minds about abortion, try it. It works because you’re appealing to their reason, their logic, and their conscience. I’ve done it without the camera. On a plane, I sat with a guy and I reasoned with him the same way I do in the video and he changed his mind about abortion. Then he looked at me and he said, “You know, I like the way you do this because you don’t push ideas on people. You just give them the information and leave them to make their own minds up.” And that’s exactly what happens on the video.

So this is something that works and I encourage every person that’s pro-life to talk to other people and learn how to do this. We’ve got a course that’s commended by Kay Arthur. She actually helped me put it together and the same with Randy Alcorn and it’s a 64-page book that will help you to learn how to do this, help you to learn how to address someone’s conscience, how to reason with them. It’s not something that takes tremendous intellect. I mean I don’t use big words. All I do is use logic and reason and that does work.

Josh Brahm: Your video showed graphic images of the Holocaust. What do you think about the need for pro-lifers to show graphic images of aborted children and how effective do you think they are?

Ray Comfort: Well, that’s a great question and it’s something I wrestle with. When people say I showed graphic images of the Jews in the Holocaust, actually I didn’t. I held back on showing decapitated heads, shrunken heads, human skin used for lamp shades and teenage girls being hung by the neck and Nazis laughing at them. I just felt they were too graphic because I did an experiment. I put in graphic images of cut-up babies and I watched people closely to see how they would react and people that were tender-hearted, that were just brokenhearted with abortion, I watched them look away. They couldn’t look at those images and I thought, some people that can handle it, they can look at that and go, “Well, that’s terrible.” Other people just turn away and I don’t want to turn people away. I want people to stay for the gospel presentation because that’s the most important part. And so we did wrestle with it and we decided not to put in too many graphic images both of bodies of Jews and of bodies of babies.

Josh Brahm: A lot of Christian ministries avoid talking about abortion because it is a controversial issue. Based on your experience, do you find that it has been effective to get people to talk about their beliefs?

Ray Comfort: Yeah, the reason I think a lot of Christians don’t want to talk about abortion is because the secular press or media have demonized those courageous Christians that stand outside abortion clinics, that made them out to be hatemongers and doctor killers and fundamentalist, narrow-minded bigots that want to take a woman’s choice from them. And so, it’s quite intimidating for a Christian to get involved in the pro-life movement as it is at the moment.

And I’m sure many good Germans actually got into the pro-Jew cause in 1949 and ’41 and perhaps stood outside concentration camps and protested or maybe wrote something on a pamphlet and lost their lives because of their cause. We don’t need to pay such a price. What we can do is use this video, either send 180movie.com via e-mail to someone, encourage them to watch it, or they can get the video from us. We sell them at $1 each. We’re giving away 200,000 in universities across the country. 100 universities this month in one day.

And so there is something we can do and when people realize that they don’t have to muster the courage to stand outside abortion clinics and be demonized because there are other things they can do, I think we’re going to see a groundswell of movement towards speaking up against the murder of unborn in our country.

Josh Brahm: The first 20 minutes of your movie got a really good review from a pro-life non-theist on the secular pro-life blog. But that person was disappointed in the evangelism, last part of your movie. What do you think of non-Christian participation in the pro-life movement?

Ray Comfort: I think it’s wonderful. Just as everybody, not only Christians, should have spoken up against the killing of the Jews in the Second World War, everybody should speak out against the killing of the unborn. And I can understand why they were offended because the gospel has an offense to it. But now I’ve got more chance to flossing the back teeth of the lions in the L.A. zoo at feeding time than I have of getting the gospel out, because that’s the reason I created that movie is to tell people how they could find everlasting life.

So if they want a pro-life video that’s effective, they have to take it as it is. That’s why we’ve got that FBI threat at the beginning not to duplicate this movie because we knew that secular people would say, “Boy, this is [unintelligible], let me just cut off that gospel stuff.” Well, we’re not allowing them to do that because that’s so important.

Josh Brahm: Final question. How can pro-life people get involved, Ray?

Ray Comfort: Well, they can do as I said, see that the social media is just such a powerful force, the video that we’ve got on 180movie.com within one week is just hitting nearly half a million views. And that’s huge. This isn’t a one-minute “Charlie Bit My Finger” YouTube clip. This is a 33-minute video that people commit to watching.

So we’re absolutely ecstatic and we just want pro-lifers, whether they be secular or Christian, to send this all over the world, all over the Internet and encourage other people to watch it and pass it on. And also they can get the – they can go to HeartChanger.com and get the actual video for a dollar each and pass them out outside their local school, wherever people are going to take a free video. It takes – it’s got perceived value. It’s worth about $10. So especially with today’s economy, if someone giving away free DVDs, people are going to take them and watch them.

Josh Brahm: Alright. As much as we’d love to spend more time with Ray, he has a series of more interviews to get to. Ray, thanks for joining us. We’re going to do our best to get “180” in front of even more people.

Ray Comfort: Oh, thanks so much, Josh. God bless you.

 

Thanks to Margie Miguel for providing the transcript. Thanks to Trent Horn, Jojo Ruba, Kelsey Hazzard and Roni Melton for coming up with some great questions. 

  • Tom

    Ray Comfort has as much grip on reality as Peter Pan. His film is a diatribe of nonsensical and invalid comparisons.

    • oldmanbob

      Sorry Tom, mass killing of humans made in the image of God is mass killing of humans and that is called a holocaust.  Now that 50,000,000 babies have been murdered in numbers alone this is a greater horror than the holocausts in the 1900′s.  Just because they are much smaller and killed for the most part one at a time does not change the fact that abortion has become a holocaust.

      • Tom

        No, your description of abortion as a holocaust is subjective, emotive and spurious propaganda.

        They are two distinctly different paradigms in their purpose, intent, actions and outcomes.

        • Anonymous

           the outcome is still murder, mass murder, thats objective and a illegal act.

      • 12angrymen

        http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005143Here. This is a basic article on the World War II Holocaust. Read it. You will see it has resemblance to abortion.

        • 12angrymen

          **little resemblance** my mistake.

          • Guest

            No, no… you had it right the first time.

        • Djushi

          As I recall, he didn’t say it was a replica of ‘The’ Holocaust. He said it bore resemblence to ‘The’ Holocaust and was *A* holocaust. Yes, ‘holocaust’ the word comes from ‘sacrifice by fire’. So?  I can assure you that most of the Jews murdered in The Holocaust were not sacrificed by fire either. The Holocaust was a mass-murder and a mass-torture. The abortion holocaust is much the same in our opinions. Knowledgable people have reported that Young Ones (translation of ‘fetus’) can feel pain, and I would say that being torn limb from limb is a torture. It also results in death. Torture and murder, performed on massive numbers of people. Wow. Just like ‘The’ Holocaust!
          BTW, of course is a Young One was not a person, it would not be mass-murder at all. I’m happy to debate that issue (again) if you want.

          • 12angrymen

            Did you actually read the entire article? Yes, if you see abortion as mass murder then it has one, one similarity to the Holocaust. My problem is it has so many more differences. Abortion does not try to kill off one single group of people, nor has it killed off entire generations. Abortion does not place people into camps and work people until they die from starvation and exhaustion. Abortion does not make the aborted watch their entire family and friends die in front of them. Abortion has not wiped out over 2/3 of a people group living in a country. 
            Yes, you could say abortion has one similarity to the holocaust, but so do the other mass killings that have occurred all over the world. 

          • Djushi

            Yes, other mass-killings across the world and through history also resemble at some level ‘The’ Holocaust. I think you make the mistake again of mixing up ‘A holocaust’ and ‘The’ Holocaust. No, not every holocaust is ‘The’ Holocaust – only ‘The’ Holocaust will ever be itself. I also don’t think that abortion is a systematic extermination of a people group. The Young Ones are our own flesh and blood, share our DNA and are as alike to us as the next person. This holocaust (note lower case ‘h’) is an extermination of an age group. Abortion simply can’t be used on anyone no longer inside their mother (as far as I am aware).
            If you think that ‘A’ holocaust must be a replica of and have the same effects as ‘The’ Holocaust,  does that mean that a white house must be a replica of The White House? Proper noun and common noun.
            Yes there are differences between The holocaust and this holocaust. In addition to those you posed, I point out:
            Those destined for abortion cannot run away (further than the confines of their mothers’ wombs)
            Those aborted are killed with approval of their own relatives (in most cases)
            Abortion has killed far more than The Holocaust
            Abortion happens all over the world
            I think that abortion is a holocaust. Perhaps other mass-killings were also holocausts. Problem with that? There have not been so many mass-killings of these scales and in these time frames. I would not have a problem calling Mao’s slaughter of millions a holocaust. Not ‘The’ Holocaust, but a holocaust.

          • 12angrymen

            But he (and many other pro lifers) are not simply calling it “a” holocaust. They are directly comparing it to, and saying it is almost the same as “the” Holocaust. That is my problem. They are using the Holocaust simply to illicit an emotional response that often comes at the cost of people who are or have relative survivors of the Holocaust (not making that up). People are so quick to use the Holocaust to further their cause that they belittle and forget the horrors that the comparison actually entails. I have actually had someone tell me that “abortion is worse than the Holocaust because abortion kills babies and the Holocaust killed Jews.” How horrible is that?

          • Djushi

            That is horrible.
            But understandable to some level. People generally feel it to be a worse crime the more helpless the victim is. The unborn child is utterly helpless. The Jews were almost utterly helpless.
            Yes, comparing this holocaust to The Holocaust is designed to ellicit an emotional response. Without emotion (I’m a writer, btw, I cultivate emotion) there is little action. Abortion if a horrible atrocity. If you said that to someone, they could agree or disagree quite easily. We need to get people to say that for themselves. Despite the differences, I think you’ll understand that the best comparison we can make is with The Holocaust. Not Mao’s mass-murder, because Americans (I’m not American, but this site and the movie is) don’t have any link with it. It would be much like saying to someone who’s never heard of a Stringybark Gum, ‘But it’s like a Yellow Box Gum! How great is that?’ You’d get black stares. Huh?
             No, the sufferings of unborn children does not reach the level of the sufferings of the Jews in concentration camps. I don’t think anyone suggests that or believes that. Some Jews were killed quickly and relatively painlessly. They were still part of The Holocaust. Some babies are killed before they feel pain. Still part of this holocaust.
            One of the main comparisons Ray Comfort was trying to make, I think, was that no one stood up and said, ‘That’s WRONG, stop it.’ The German people closed their eyes, just as we, the people of the Western nations, close ours. 
            There are aspects of The Holocaust which are vastly different to this holocaust. There are still valid comparisons and valid reasons to use them – if you believe abortion is murder. Agree?

          • 12angrymen

            I’m afraid we’ll have to agree to disagree on this one. I can definitely see where you’re coming from, and appreciate how civil you are being. However I have heard too many people of Jewish decent  say they feel comparisons such as this belittle and even cause people to have inaccurate beliefs about the Holocaust. Also, I guess another big concern with this comparison is that I have heard way too many people use this comparison to disrespect the victims of the Holocaust (ie the quote I used in my last post). Although I can say that you do not seem to be one of those people, and I applaud that. 

          • Djushi

            That’s okay, I’ll agree to disagree. Of course, I don’t agree with people belittling The Holocaust or its survivors … but if The Holocaust is compared to abortion in a way that does neither, I think it is acceptable and useful.
            Cheers :)

          • Anonymous

            If only half theabortions in the US since Roe have been murders and not self defense then that is over 4 times the murders of the born in the German Holocaust.            
              I   highly suspect more of them were murders than the number of the born in the US since Roe which averages  nearly 10,000 a year.                       
              I suspect the number of murders of the unborn has averaged per year in the US over 80 times the number of the born.                                                                                                                
               Even if its only 30% of the born average that is still more murdered per year than was murdered on 9/11.  
              You mean the government of a civilized society is going to ignore a 9/11 or worse or far worse every year.                   
              I don’t think so.

    • Anonymous

      Towards the last I agree some but the comprisions of abortions ( at least the vast majority I think but not those in self defense) with the Nazi Holocaust was spot on.

  • Anonymous

    incredibly moving video.  I’m sure you’ve watched it, if you’re reading this interview. I saw the link for it on LiveAction and thought, hey I’ll skim it for a minute and come back later…. ha!  30 minutes later I was glued to my chair, moved to tears.   This is undoubtedly one of the best, most powerful methods I’ve seen used in evangelism and in the discussion of abortion.. and I have been involved in evangelism for 20yrs.

  • Pingback: Josh Brahm Interviews Ray Comfort about “180″ | Foundation Life

  • http://profiles.google.com/maraudertheslashnymph Marauder The Slash Nymph

    About the gay girl who didn’t change her mind – I’m bisexual and I’ve always been pro-life, so I’d just like to say that being GLBT and being pro-choice don’t automatically go hand-in-hand.

    I’m with the pro-life non-theist, I think 180 was good up until the evangelism part. That doesn’t mean I’m “offended” by it – I just don’t think it’s necessarily effective to tell people they’re lying adulterers who are going to hell. First of all, no one but God knows whether we’re going to heaven or hell. Second, it comes across as more self-righteous than spoken out of genuine concern. Third, it links being pro-life to Judeo-Christian beliefs, and although the two obviously go together a lot of the time, people who aren’t overly familiar with the pro-life movement need to realize that you can have any religion or no religion and still be pro-life, simply because killing babies in the womb is wrong, period.

    • Anonymous

       being anti murder is just basic human ethics and its very much in keeping with  proper Anglo/ American legal culture.           
        Legislation against consentual life style of adults is not proper Anglo/ American law although private property owners have a right to deny access.

    • Anonymous

      Yeah I think the gay woman could have firmly been won over to pro life by someone else.

    • http://twitter.com/patrickptomey Patrick Ptomey

      I am the one who wrote the secularist review of 180. I’m glad to see you agree that the proselytizing was not necessary for this pro-life film. Granted, I recognize Ray has the option to do whatever he wishes with his own film, it just leaves a sour taste in my mouth knowing that this video could have been much more effective to the pro-choice crowd watching had he stuck to his pro-life arguments. Oh well. Read my blog here: http://frompatricksperspective.blogspot.com/2011/09/180-movie.html

    • OneMereChristian

      I respect your view about this, and thank you for realizing the value of human life. But I disagree with the non-effectiveness of evangelization that you point out.
      I think it could be even more effective to include the parts about lying, thieving, adultery. Not only does the pro-life portion of the video get people to think about right and wrong in regards to pre-born babies, but about morality in everything. Someone can be pro-life and not be Christian, just as you say. But someone can also be pro-life and believe and live very immorally. I think it reinforced that there are moral reasons behind defending pre-born babies, not just logic.

  • Anonymous

    Good video except for me towards the last when it got into the Christian Bible aspect.                    
       I know there is a God and I’m pro life except in cases of self defense which is the Anglo/ American common law standard and the Natural Law standard.                       
     In the US we do not need seperate legislation for abortion since killing a human is illegal except in self defense.                                        
      Under our Anglo/ American legal culture the accused has a right to a fully informed grand jury inditment before going to trial before a fully informed jury.        
      In fact a jury trial is required except in impeachment cases, it must happen in the state where the crime occured and the jury must be from that state.             
      Here in Tennessee the defedent has a right to demand a jury come from the county in which the crime occured and the trial be held in that county.                                               
     A fully informed jury is the judge telling the jury the following that John Adams said they have the authority, the right and the duty to judge both the facts before them and the law, they have the authority to veto legislation and regulations as far as the case before them plus if they do find the defendent guilty they can show mercy and give a lower sentence  and or fine set by the legislators although they can never increase the sentence or fine set by the legislators or punish the defedent without the approval of the legislators.                                                                                                      
                    If the jury says not guilty that can never be changed by law and if they give a reduced fine and or sentence that can never be increased by law although the defendent in some cases has a right to appeal a  decesion of the jury that goes against them.                 
      Its by far not perfect  when followed juries can knowly set free some doers of very evil acts but history shows thats a small percentage of cases and its less than judge only bench trials. IN my view the  proper Anglo/ American legal system is the best mortal legal system in the world when followed.                                                                                          
      What percentage of the 53 million abortions were murder I have no idea.                                               
        1 murder would be to many, 12% would be as barbaric and evil as the Holcuast in Germany,          
      80% would be worse than the mass murder of the born under Stalin topped only by Mao but I suspect less than 10% was in self defense.                       
      I don’t know thats why the murder of all babies must be illegal again in the US plus the mothers as well as the doctors should be prosectued.                                                                       
      Of course no expo facto the prosecution should only occur after acts committed after overturning Roe V Wade.

    • http://twitter.com/patrickptomey Patrick Ptomey

      I am the one who wrote the secularist review of 180. I’m glad to see you
      agree that the proselytizing was not necessary for this pro-life film.
      Granted, I recognize Ray has the option to do whatever he wishes with
      his own film, it just leaves a sour taste in my mouth knowing that this
      video could have been much more effective to the pro-choice crowd
      watching had he stuck to his pro-life arguments. Oh well. Read my blog
      here: http://frompatricksperspective.blogspot.com/2011/09/180-movie.html

  • Pingback: Labeling Abortion as “America’s Holocaust”

  • Pingback: The 20 Most Popular Life Report Episodes of 2011 « Life Report

  • Pingback: An Interview with Ray Comfort about “180″ : Right to Life of Central California

  • Pingback: #140: Evaluating the “180″ Documentary – Part 1 « Life Report

  • Pingback: #141: Evaluating the “180″ Documentary – Part 2 « Life Report