Comments on: Anti-Life Website Fails to Rebut Pro-Life Argument

By: Roy Boy

Roy Boy — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:05:33 +0000

The truth shall withstand criticism, challenges, and scrutiny.

You have spoken the truth, Lila & Live Action.

Pro-abortionists only answer: "Don't bother me with the truth, I've already made up my mind."

By: shanaynay

shanaynay — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 20:34:20 +0000

Beautiful! Just beautiful! Oh, pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease ms. kathy won't you accept and settle this once and for all? In the name of all militant and feminist…btw, what does the rh stand for in rh reality check? real half-wit?

By: Daredevil

Daredevil — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:43:26 +0000

The whole idea that once the child is born both fathers and mothers are responsible to take care of that person, unless they give up the child for adoption, presumes on the fact the child is really a person in the womb, since both father and mother are responsible for conception of that child.

Rights and responsibility come hand in hand.

By: Daredevil

Daredevil — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:42:05 +0000

The other hypocrisy of the pro-choicers is their statement women can do what they want with their own bodies in choosing to be mothers or not, to be free or not from consequences of sex, yet they deny those rights to men saying if they have sex, and the mothers choose to give birth, they have no right to walk away from fatherhoods.

It is called "freedom to choose what I want to do with my own body free of consequences of having to have the child, but no freedom for thee."

By: Daredevil

Daredevil — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:37:09 +0000

Agreed, not all pro-lifers are religious. There are atheists/agnositcs for life, libertarians for life, feminists for life, gays for life, etc., etc.

I am religious though.

By: Daredevil

Daredevil — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:36:18 +0000

Ciara,

Where their argument of "it's my body I can do what I want it" breaks down is that many of them don't believe their own line.

Here's the thing- they don't support the idea for example men can murder, assault, rape, kidnap, rob, etc., etc., another human being violent. Those cases after all involve men doing what they want with their own bodies. No amount of the pro-choicers saying that it's at the expenses of others can take away from the fact those cases do involve actions of men doing something with their own bodies, be it using their hands to stab or fire a gun, etc., etc.

By their logic, they can't condemn Roeder since after all he was doing what he wants with his body, or part of it, which is his hand used to fire the gun that killed Tiller.

The reason we can condemn Roeder is because he violated our principles of pro-life.

But what he did not do is violate the principle of "it's my body I can do what I want free of legal repurcussions."

That's what happen when you take the pro-choice argument down to its logical conclusion. It is an absurd argument like you said.

By: tre'

tre' — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:24:07 +0000

i dont like the assumption that all pro-life people are religious. not attacking anyone, but its always something ive heard. im "undecided", but im extremely pro-life. although i do see why there'd be a correlation between religion and the value of life. but i agree with ciara.

By: Ciara

Ciara — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:18:47 +0000

I would love to see this debate! I find that whenever a Pro-life person wants to debate topics like this the Pro-abortion people do exactly what Reeves is doing, throw shallow punches as personal opinions and people who don't have a brain accept it as if it was proof enough. I always think that those who are Pro-choice don't believe in God, don't want to get religious but it honestly all comes down to that, humans continue to think that we have a saying on how things should be and all we end up doing is making things worst. Since pro-choice people can't really argue that point without making themselves look ridiculous they aim for " It's our body", "We have a saying to what happens to our body", blah blah blah! Ignorance!

By: Patrick Kniesler

Patrick Kniesler — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:17:32 +0000

"Schmidt’s claim that abortion causes women to die in childbirth (try to follow that one) is not the only hole in his argument." – Reeves

If she really doesn't understand this concept it will be a very short debate ;]

By: Nate Sheets

Nate Sheets — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:59:45 +0000

That would be a fun debate to watch! I wouldn't hold my breath though!