<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nick Cannon Thanks His Mother for Not Aborting Him; Feminists Jeer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/</link>
	<description>Talking about human rights, abortion, &#38; life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woman by Design</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/comment-page-1/#comment-1996</link>
		<dc:creator>Woman by Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=1241#comment-1996</guid>
		<description>Whether there is consent or rape if there is a pregnancy there is a life.  Very simply, if it is not dead, it is alive.  In order for it not to be alive it must die.  If it does not die of natural causes, it is a life taken.  There is a purpose and a plan that has been killed, stolen and destroyed.  The very small sacrifice of carrying a child does not compare to the sacrifice of the eternal soul.  If you have ever been bullied into having an abortion or convinced by adults that at 14 you should be able to make this decision about not only your future, but the future of the unborn life, and you live the life of sorrow so many women in this position have experienced, then cry out to Jesus for forgiveness and salvation.  There is no sin too big for God.  Don&#039;t diminish His sacrifice thinking what he did was not enough to cover your sins and those of the whole world. 
If you haven&#039;t made this choice to end an unborn life and you are an abortion provider, an abortion counselor, a woman carrying an unplanned unborn life, there is still time for you to make the right choice to allow another human being to have life that was never yours to take. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether there is consent or rape if there is a pregnancy there is a life.  Very simply, if it is not dead, it is alive.  In order for it not to be alive it must die.  If it does not die of natural causes, it is a life taken.  There is a purpose and a plan that has been killed, stolen and destroyed.  The very small sacrifice of carrying a child does not compare to the sacrifice of the eternal soul.  If you have ever been bullied into having an abortion or convinced by adults that at 14 you should be able to make this decision about not only your future, but the future of the unborn life, and you live the life of sorrow so many women in this position have experienced, then cry out to Jesus for forgiveness and salvation.  There is no sin too big for God.  Don&#039;t diminish His sacrifice thinking what he did was not enough to cover your sins and those of the whole world.</p>
<p>If you haven&#039;t made this choice to end an unborn life and you are an abortion provider, an abortion counselor, a woman carrying an unplanned unborn life, there is still time for you to make the right choice to allow another human being to have life that was never yours to take. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janice</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/comment-page-1/#comment-1984</link>
		<dc:creator>janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=1241#comment-1984</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a 55 year old Grandma and I loved Nick&#039;s video. I never heard of this Chloe. He is a really cute guy and I&#039;m sure his career will continue to be successful. I could relate and I, like his mother went to have an abortion and I know without a doubt God stepped in as they said I was 20 weeks and that was impossible. I could only be 12 weeks. I went back home and never had the abortion. My son is now 25 with 2 precious babies. I thank God every day for him and his children. He is the love of my life and has brought me more joy than I could have ever imagined. Praise our merciful God! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m a 55 year old Grandma and I loved Nick&#039;s video. I never heard of this Chloe. He is a really cute guy and I&#039;m sure his career will continue to be successful. I could relate and I, like his mother went to have an abortion and I know without a doubt God stepped in as they said I was 20 weeks and that was impossible. I could only be 12 weeks. I went back home and never had the abortion. My son is now 25 with 2 precious babies. I thank God every day for him and his children. He is the love of my life and has brought me more joy than I could have ever imagined. Praise our merciful God! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMG</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/comment-page-1/#comment-1961</link>
		<dc:creator>GMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=1241#comment-1961</guid>
		<description>Shana, an egg and a fetus are different.  A human egg by itself does not have the potential to become a life, it has to be fertilized by a sperm.  In basic terms, it takes a mom and a dad, even at the single cell level, to make a baby.  An egg, by itself, only has 1/2 the genetic material to make a life.  Sperm has the other 1/2.  Only together can a life be made.   
 
Once again, basic biology is forgotten. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shana, an egg and a fetus are different.  A human egg by itself does not have the potential to become a life, it has to be fertilized by a sperm.  In basic terms, it takes a mom and a dad, even at the single cell level, to make a baby.  An egg, by itself, only has 1/2 the genetic material to make a life.  Sperm has the other 1/2.  Only together can a life be made.  </p>
<p>Once again, basic biology is forgotten. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ninek</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/comment-page-1/#comment-1919</link>
		<dc:creator>ninek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=1241#comment-1919</guid>
		<description>Abortion is the UNchoice.  Over 60% of women who have gone through it were coerced, bullied, or threatened. 
 
A developing human is not a &#039;potential human.&#039;  Once the sperm fertilizes the egg, life has begun.  There&#039;s nothing &#039;potential&#039; about it.   A developing human is given many names along its vector of life: fetus, newborn, toddler, teenager.  All of these descriptions are of humans who have not yet begun aging.  At no point along that vector is murder justified.  Your &#039;choice&#039; means murder, plain and simple. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abortion is the UNchoice.  Over 60% of women who have gone through it were coerced, bullied, or threatened.</p>
<p>A developing human is not a &#039;potential human.&#039;  Once the sperm fertilizes the egg, life has begun.  There&#039;s nothing &#039;potential&#039; about it.   A developing human is given many names along its vector of life: fetus, newborn, toddler, teenager.  All of these descriptions are of humans who have not yet begun aging.  At no point along that vector is murder justified.  Your &#039;choice&#039; means murder, plain and simple. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shana Porter</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/comment-page-1/#comment-1910</link>
		<dc:creator>Shana Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=1241#comment-1910</guid>
		<description>No one is forcing abortion on women who don&#039;t want one. That is inherently NOT &quot;pro-choice&quot; because &quot;pro-choice&quot; is about CHOICE. Nick Cannon&#039;s mother CHOSE to have him. She ultimately did want him, and he&#039;s appreciating that choice. However, Nick Cannon is a full-grown human. Of course he appreciates the fact that he grew up NOW, but while he was a 12-week-old fetus, he wasn&#039;t aware of his existence. If his mother had chosen to abort him then, it&#039;s not as if he would be lamenting the fact that his mother didn&#039;t keep him because he never WOULD have developed the ability to think, to want, to exist. Just because there is the potential for a human being does not make something human. Is sperm human? Are eggs human? No? They do have the potential, though, but no one says that a woman is &quot;wasting&quot; her eggs every time she gets her period. The argument for &quot;potential&quot; is absurd. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one is forcing abortion on women who don&#039;t want one. That is inherently NOT &quot;pro-choice&quot; because &quot;pro-choice&quot; is about CHOICE. Nick Cannon&#039;s mother CHOSE to have him. She ultimately did want him, and he&#039;s appreciating that choice. However, Nick Cannon is a full-grown human. Of course he appreciates the fact that he grew up NOW, but while he was a 12-week-old fetus, he wasn&#039;t aware of his existence. If his mother had chosen to abort him then, it&#039;s not as if he would be lamenting the fact that his mother didn&#039;t keep him because he never WOULD have developed the ability to think, to want, to exist. Just because there is the potential for a human being does not make something human. Is sperm human? Are eggs human? No? They do have the potential, though, but no one says that a woman is &quot;wasting&quot; her eggs every time she gets her period. The argument for &quot;potential&quot; is absurd. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maria</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/comment-page-1/#comment-1879</link>
		<dc:creator>maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=1241#comment-1879</guid>
		<description>I am a feminist and pro-life. As others have written here, modern feminists today make the issue of abortion a woman vs. child situation, while our feminist foremothers saw abortion as further means to objectify a woman and to disregard tiny humans in the same way that men disregarded women as humans. Since when is it pro-woman to kill little women in the womb?  
 
Since when is it pro-woman to promote women to make a &quot;choice&quot; they usually make because they feel as though there is nowhere else to turn? - their boyfriends will abandon them, their parents will kick them out, their bosses will fire them, their universities will take away their scholarship money... and all of this anti-feminism will continue as soon as the abortion is carried out!   
 
Since when is it pro-woman to cover up sexual abuses as Planned Parenthood has repeatedly done, take care of the &quot;problem&quot; (the pregnancy), and send the women straight back to continue to be abused with utterly no repercussions for the abuser? 
 
Since when is it pro-woman to lie to the women about what is happening inside their bodies during a pregnancy, as PP has repeatedly done? Since when is it anti-woman to show women ultrasounds of their unborn so they are truly making the most informed choice possible?  
 
It is time for &quot;feminists&quot; to own up to these injustices against women and reclaim womanhood, to demand that this act which kills one human and wounds another finally end, legal or illegal. 
 
Frederica Matthewes-Green: &quot;It is because I still believe so strongly in the right of a woman to protect her body that I now oppose abortion. That right must begin when her body begins, and it must be hers no matter where she lives--even if she lives in her mother&#039;s womb.&quot; 
 
Susan B. Anthony: &quot;It [abortion] will burden her conscience in life, it will burden her soul in death; But oh, thrice guilty is he who drove her to the desperation which impelled her to the crime!&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a feminist and pro-life. As others have written here, modern feminists today make the issue of abortion a woman vs. child situation, while our feminist foremothers saw abortion as further means to objectify a woman and to disregard tiny humans in the same way that men disregarded women as humans. Since when is it pro-woman to kill little women in the womb? </p>
<p>Since when is it pro-woman to promote women to make a &quot;choice&quot; they usually make because they feel as though there is nowhere else to turn? &#8211; their boyfriends will abandon them, their parents will kick them out, their bosses will fire them, their universities will take away their scholarship money&#8230; and all of this anti-feminism will continue as soon as the abortion is carried out!  </p>
<p>Since when is it pro-woman to cover up sexual abuses as Planned Parenthood has repeatedly done, take care of the &quot;problem&quot; (the pregnancy), and send the women straight back to continue to be abused with utterly no repercussions for the abuser?</p>
<p>Since when is it pro-woman to lie to the women about what is happening inside their bodies during a pregnancy, as PP has repeatedly done? Since when is it anti-woman to show women ultrasounds of their unborn so they are truly making the most informed choice possible? </p>
<p>It is time for &quot;feminists&quot; to own up to these injustices against women and reclaim womanhood, to demand that this act which kills one human and wounds another finally end, legal or illegal.</p>
<p>Frederica Matthewes-Green: &quot;It is because I still believe so strongly in the right of a woman to protect her body that I now oppose abortion. That right must begin when her body begins, and it must be hers no matter where she lives&#8211;even if she lives in her mother&#039;s womb.&quot;</p>
<p>Susan B. Anthony: &quot;It [abortion] will burden her conscience in life, it will burden her soul in death; But oh, thrice guilty is he who drove her to the desperation which impelled her to the crime!&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/comment-page-1/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 08:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=1241#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>AI, I don&#039;t think she is misrepresenting the feminist argument at all. The problem of casting humans as natural enemies is philosophically problematic in all cases, including pregnancy. The idea that women by nature have conflicting interests with their child that are worth killing over is faulty. Cassy is making the point (as is Cannon) that NOT killing your child, especially when it requires a lot of sacrifice (it always does, just of varying levels and differing kinds of sacrifice) is the way that women can best love their children, even if they give them up for adoption and never meet them. 
 
It is a false choice. Most men and women are not &quot;subject to an experience they do not want&quot; when they are pregnant. They (often) chose sexual activity, so they chose pregnancy, no matter how we try to avoid linking the two. In biology they are linked, in all copulating species.  
 
But pitting the mother and child against each other, as if the happiness of care free days, or graduating from college is worth the loss of the joy and love that a whole human life can produce is wrong. It is *not* better for the mother, she is not making a better choice. She is losing a child which any parent will tell you is unimaginable, weighed against any other thing in their life, college, wealth, financial security, housing, etc. included. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AI, I don&#039;t think she is misrepresenting the feminist argument at all. The problem of casting humans as natural enemies is philosophically problematic in all cases, including pregnancy. The idea that women by nature have conflicting interests with their child that are worth killing over is faulty. Cassy is making the point (as is Cannon) that NOT killing your child, especially when it requires a lot of sacrifice (it always does, just of varying levels and differing kinds of sacrifice) is the way that women can best love their children, even if they give them up for adoption and never meet them.</p>
<p>It is a false choice. Most men and women are not &quot;subject to an experience they do not want&quot; when they are pregnant. They (often) chose sexual activity, so they chose pregnancy, no matter how we try to avoid linking the two. In biology they are linked, in all copulating species. </p>
<p>But pitting the mother and child against each other, as if the happiness of care free days, or graduating from college is worth the loss of the joy and love that a whole human life can produce is wrong. It is *not* better for the mother, she is not making a better choice. She is losing a child which any parent will tell you is unimaginable, weighed against any other thing in their life, college, wealth, financial security, housing, etc. included. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/comment-page-1/#comment-1871</link>
		<dc:creator>David Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=1241#comment-1871</guid>
		<description>You can see the video at: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdOCwd9EttE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdOCwd9EttE&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see the video at: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdOCwd9EttE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdOCwd9EttE</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/comment-page-1/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 21:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=1241#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>Cassy, I think you misrepresent Chloe and the feminist approach to issues surrounding abortion. It isn&#039;t that feminists are adamant that women have abortion.They argue for the choice and for abortion to be a viable option. I acknowledge that pregnancy can be a positive, life changing experience for many, but all women should not be subject to an experience that they do not want just because they are capable of carrying a child. The argument is for choice and possibility. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cassy, I think you misrepresent Chloe and the feminist approach to issues surrounding abortion. It isn&#039;t that feminists are adamant that women have abortion.They argue for the choice and for abortion to be a viable option. I acknowledge that pregnancy can be a positive, life changing experience for many, but all women should not be subject to an experience that they do not want just because they are capable of carrying a child. The argument is for choice and possibility. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Knox</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/comment-page-1/#comment-1867</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Knox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=1241#comment-1867</guid>
		<description>Awesome entry Cassy! 
 
@Jewels: here is the video: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdOCwd9EttE&amp;feature=player_embedded&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdOCwd9EttE&amp;fe...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome entry Cassy!</p>
<p>@Jewels: here is the video: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdOCwd9EttE&amp;feature=player_embedded" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdOCwd9EttE&#038;fe" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdOCwd9EttE&#038;fe</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jewels</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/comment-page-1/#comment-1866</link>
		<dc:creator>Jewels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=1241#comment-1866</guid>
		<description>Great post, but is there a link to the video somewhere? I&#039;d like to support Nick and check it out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, but is there a link to the video somewhere? I&#039;d like to support Nick and check it out. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ceecee</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/nick-cannon-thanks-his-mother-for-not-aborting-him-feminists-jeer/comment-page-1/#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator>Ceecee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=1241#comment-1864</guid>
		<description>This Chloe person howls that Cannon tries to talk women out of having abortions.  Why is that so terrible?  Sure he&#039;s trying to influence someone&#039;s choice, but don&#039;t the pro-aborts do that too?  Are they the only ones allowed to influence somebody&#039;s choice?  When they do it, it&#039;s OK.  But when pro-lifers do it, ohhhhh... They&#039;re bad, naughty naughty.  Only pro-aborts are allowed to influence a pregnany woman&#039;s choice.  These people have such a double standard it&#039;s sickening.   
 
Chloe howls about how any concern for the fetus at all shows an anti-woman bent.  That&#039;s casting the mother and child as enemies.  It is such a tiresome trick.  Not every woman in a tight spot wants to view her unborn baby as the enemy.  Not every woman wants the world to choose between her and the child.  But that&#039;s where the pro-aborts insist most pregnancies be viewed.   
 
Truth to tell, some women have had unplanned pregnancies, even at a young age, given birth, and gone on to become doctors.  Other women never had any children and their lives have gone nowhere.  Having children doesn&#039;t wreck your life.  Being persecuted can wreck your life, rejecting God can wreck your life.  Drugs, alchohol, and a whole host of other things can wreck your life.  A baby won&#039;t necessarily do it.  And you can always choose adoption if you really have no power to care for a baby. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Chloe person howls that Cannon tries to talk women out of having abortions.  Why is that so terrible?  Sure he&#039;s trying to influence someone&#039;s choice, but don&#039;t the pro-aborts do that too?  Are they the only ones allowed to influence somebody&#039;s choice?  When they do it, it&#039;s OK.  But when pro-lifers do it, ohhhhh&#8230; They&#039;re bad, naughty naughty.  Only pro-aborts are allowed to influence a pregnany woman&#039;s choice.  These people have such a double standard it&#039;s sickening.  </p>
<p>Chloe howls about how any concern for the fetus at all shows an anti-woman bent.  That&#039;s casting the mother and child as enemies.  It is such a tiresome trick.  Not every woman in a tight spot wants to view her unborn baby as the enemy.  Not every woman wants the world to choose between her and the child.  But that&#039;s where the pro-aborts insist most pregnancies be viewed.  </p>
<p>Truth to tell, some women have had unplanned pregnancies, even at a young age, given birth, and gone on to become doctors.  Other women never had any children and their lives have gone nowhere.  Having children doesn&#039;t wreck your life.  Being persecuted can wreck your life, rejecting God can wreck your life.  Drugs, alchohol, and a whole host of other things can wreck your life.  A baby won&#039;t necessarily do it.  And you can always choose adoption if you really have no power to care for a baby. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 13/29 queries in 0.051 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: liveaction.org @ 2012-05-21 10:40:49 -->
