Planned Parenthood of WI Makes False Statements, Failed to Report Child Sex Abuse
Yesterday, we released the following undercover video showing Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin ignoring the sexual abuse of a 14-year-old minor by a 31-year-old partner:
Planned Parenthood responded by claiming that they would have reported the sexual abuse to police as required by law except that our undercover investigator didn’t give them her name.
One big problem, we DID give first name, last name, and date of birth and yet Planned Parenthood failed to do their legal duty. Watch the footage showing our undercover investigator giving Planned Parenthood this information:
This proves that Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin’s CEO Teri Huyck was making a false statement and that they failed to report sexual abuse as required by law.
These important questions must be answered:
- How often does Planned Parenthood violate Wisconsin state law in this manner?
- Will Planned Parenthood now apologize to the public for their breach of law and endangerment of young girls at the hands of sexual predators?
- Will Planned Parenthood open an investigation into their own counseling practices?
- Will the District Attorney open an investigation and prosecute this violation of law?
- Will the Wisconsin Attorney General probe whether other cases of sexual abuse of minors are not being properly reported?
Popularity: 6% [?]
Answers:
1. All the time!
2. Never!
3. No – this is exactly how they work
4. Maybe, but just to get us off his back
5. Probably not, but we can always hope…
How’d I do?
You foolish people are doing nothing to stop abortion. You are merely causing a back alley abortion to inevitably supersede your nonsense. Our government funds these PP clinics and they will not back them up, but rather hide as cowards do~
Looks like “Angela Scott Ryan” is now on record supporting child sexual abuse reporting laws being broken.
Robert,
Of course. After all, they see their unborn when they don’t want the unborn as pretty much PARASITES. So how can we believe they will see the yoing among us as much better other than to promote their agenda?
I think a crime is a crime whether or not it happens in a government approved abortuary or in an alley. It’s like saying that we need to have special places for lawful drive by shootings so they can happen safely, and if we don’t, then we might end up with more back alley drive by’s. Legalize murder so it can be safe, after all, they’re going to do it anyway.
In light of this article re: coerced pregnancies PP actions are also helping to continue the spread of Domestic Violence. Why do they say they are all about protecting women? They are just covering up abuse & manipulation of young women.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/232542
These reporting requirements are an underhanded legalistic maneuver to harass young people in trouble and those who are helping them out. You can’t accomplish your goals in a straight forward manner by persuasion, so you resort to inflicting more pain on those who are already suffering.
Angela, thanks for speaking up!
“These reporting requirements are an underhanded legalistic maneuver to harass young people in trouble and those who are helping them out. You can’t accomplish your goals in a straight forward manner by persuasion, so you resort to inflicting more pain on those who are already suffering.”
The young people are not even being harassed here, so I don’t even know what you are talking about.
Just admit you are in favor of young women choosing to abort much younger people to get rid of them.
Nonsense. PP covered up sexual predators and abuse and got cauht doing so many times. So how is that helping young people in trouble? Aborting their babies to cover up the evidence of sexual abuse and predatory behaviours of older men?
If you call this underhanded, I suggest you accuse the same exact way all police undercover cops who go in using same methods to catch sexual predators, murderersm etc.
* The young people are not even being harassed here, so I don’t even know what you are talking about.
Reporting young people’s sexual relationships to the police is harassment. The only reason this is being insisted upon is because it creates pain and suffering that makes it much more difficult for a young person to exercise her right to get an abortion.
* Just admit…
I admit that I am in favor of a young women making their own choices in these cases, including the choice of an abortion. And I want them to be able to make that choice in a supportive and comfortable environment without legalistic intimidation and harassment.
* PP covered up sexual predators and abuse and got cauht doing so many times.
In this case, there was no 14 year old, there was no 31 year old, there was not “sexual child abuse.” You are confusing a “made for TV movie” with reality.
* Aborting their babies to cover up the evidence of sexual abuse…
Forcing a young girl to bear a baby as “evidence” that has to be “preserved” in order to enforce any law, let alone laws that are largely antiquated, ignored and unenforceable to begin with is basically, radically, inhumane. In actual fact, of course, prosecuting cases of “sexual abuse” is not what this is about. Its about harassing young girls who are simply exercising their rights under the law and those who are helping them.
* exact way all police undercover cops who go in using same methods to catch sexual predators
Health care professionals are not “undercover cops” who have the responsibility of catching and prosecuting “sexual predators”. Their responsibility is to understand and help with their patient’s well being. Period.
“Reporting young people’s sexual relationships to the police is harassment.”
You are a sick person to think that girls even 11 or 12 years old should be allowed to be manipulated into sexual relationships with way older men. Your lack of concern and understand of children is despicable. I can’t believe you think child abuse is no big deal.
“In this case, there was no 14 year old, there was no 31 year old, there was not “sexual child abuse.” ”
But there are lots of documented REAL cases all over the country. Of course it is happening if Live Action catches it 10x.
Robert,
That’s what happen when radical demand for want of abortion trumps rights of women and children.
The date on this video is June 2008. Why did action league just now turn this over to the authorities nearly 2 years later? Why not right away?
CougarCat,
The honest answer is that we are a student group with very limited resources and no full-time staff so it takes us time and resources to prepare video in an accurate but time condensed way and do a media launch of a video. Without that, the video doesn’t get attention and make an impact in fighting these violations at Planned Parenthood that endanger young girls. Usually we release videos faster but this one was lost in the shuffle of our other releases. We will be able to have a more full-time team with more financial backing. Donations can be made at: http://liveaction.org/index.php/donate/
Angela Scott Ryan and reACTIONary,
http://www.lifenews.com/state4838.html
You don’t think back-alley abortions are happening NOW?!?!? LOOK at this.
Although I personally am against abortion, I do not deny that people- men and women- have free choice. If they choose to go to someone who will assist them, that is their choice.
But when that assistance is going to help cover for illegal practices- Child rape and sexual predators- It is WRONG. Pro choicer or life, it is still illegal.
Yes, the undercover video was a set up. But do you REALLY think that this is the only time they have or will neglect to report sexual illegality and abuse? If they will cover illegal crimes when they THINK a minor is involved, they will cover when an ACTUAL minor is involved.
If they will break the law in this area, what is to stop them from breaking health codes? Safety codes?
If ANY health institution- pro-abortion or not- will not abide by and remain consistent with the law, they should not be in practice.
“But when that assistance is going to help cover for illegal practices- Child rape and sexual predators- It is WRONG. Pro choicer or life, it is still illegal.”
That’s why the pro-choice argument of “it’s free choice” does not work. Guess what? Child rape and predatory also involves FREE CHOICES- at the expenses of other human beings. Just like abortion. And like abortion, it is wrong.
The only difference is abortion is illegal. But it does not make the other heinous acts much less of FREE CHOICE. Just FREE CHOICE to do evil to others that happen to be illegal.
I agree with you, yes, PP, should not in business for reasons you mentioned.
But it should not even be legal for the things that it did that’s legal- murder of unborn babies for reasons other than the most extreme cases like mother’s life in danger.
Just because it is legal for FREE CHOICE to off one’s baby does not make it any less wrong.
RE: You are a sick person to think that girls even 11 or 12 years old should be allowed to be manipulated into sexual relationships with way older men. Your lack of concern and understand of children is despicable. I can’t believe you think child abuse is no big deal.
I didn’t say child abuse isn’t a big deal. I didn’t say that older men should be allowed to manipulate young girls into sexual relationships.
What I said was that (pay attention now, we have come to the part that requires some thinking on your part) health care professionals are there to serve the interests of the young girls who come to them for help, not to rat them out to the cops.
RE: That’s why the pro-choice argument of “it’s free choice” does not work.
The pro-choice argument is not “it IS free choice”. The pro-choice argument is that “it SHOULD BE free choice.”
Your post is a distinction without a real difference. And throwing out the argument it should be free choice is not an argument of any form, other than empty slogans. Heck, even the worst offenders can throw out argument of “it should be free choice.” But substitute the word for murder, rape, kidnap, assault, etc. Just because it is a choice does not mean it is something that should be legalize.
Not all choices are created equal. And the line pro-choice is just obsfucation of what that choice is and why folks are opposed to that choice being legalize (for same reasons we oppose genoicide, serial killings, mass murder, etc., etc.).