<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polling Data: America&#8217;s Youth Becoming Pro-Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/</link>
	<description>Talking about human rights, abortion, &#38; life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-15567</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=976#comment-15567</guid>
		<description>we can argue with them, its just they wont accept a loss, or science for that matter, according to some, you magically become a human when your born, and not a second before</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we can argue with them, its just they wont accept a loss, or science for that matter, according to some, you magically become a human when your born, and not a second before</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-15566</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=976#comment-15566</guid>
		<description>so that means we should kill the poor?? that makes sense, lets just kill those who are needy and in bad circumstances, 
Fake, you are an elitist, stop taking away the poors right to life</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so that means we should kill the poor?? that makes sense, lets just kill those who are needy and in bad circumstances, <br />
Fake, you are an elitist, stop taking away the poors right to life</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-15565</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=976#comment-15565</guid>
		<description>thats new, another anti-lifer failing to make an argument against abortion...  
douche bag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats new, another anti-lifer failing to make an argument against abortion&#8230; <br />
douche bag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-15564</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=976#comment-15564</guid>
		<description>No guys hes right, why would you care about other peoples lifes, thats really inconvenient...                 


Atheist, thank you for showing your compassion toward others... ITS EVERYONES RIGHT TO KILL WHOMEVER THEY WANT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No guys hes right, why would you care about other peoples lifes, thats really inconvenient&#8230;                 </p>
<p>Atheist, thank you for showing your compassion toward others&#8230; ITS EVERYONES RIGHT TO KILL WHOMEVER THEY WANT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hovish13</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-13130</link>
		<dc:creator>Hovish13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=976#comment-13130</guid>
		<description>As a high school senior, I can safely say that my pro-life friends and I, who are attending March For Life in Washington D.C. in January (on a Monday!) , are NOT attending simply to get a day off of school- we&#039;re going because we see that the unborn are the least protected citizens in our country, that abortion is a sickening atrocity, and because we want to create a culture of LIFE in the America that we are inheriting. Do NOT stereotype us because we are young; we are aware of the gravity of the issue at hand. We are not using the petty excuse of a &quot;free pass&quot; from school to spend our OWN money, driving 10 hours from Michigan to D.C., to walk for the rights of the unborn. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a high school senior, I can safely say that my pro-life friends and I, who are attending March For Life in Washington D.C. in January (on a Monday!) , are NOT attending simply to get a day off of school- we&#8217;re going because we see that the unborn are the least protected citizens in our country, that abortion is a sickening atrocity, and because we want to create a culture of LIFE in the America that we are inheriting. Do NOT stereotype us because we are young; we are aware of the gravity of the issue at hand. We are not using the petty excuse of a &#8220;free pass&#8221; from school to spend our OWN money, driving 10 hours from Michigan to D.C., to walk for the rights of the unborn. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hovish13</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-13129</link>
		<dc:creator>Hovish13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=976#comment-13129</guid>
		<description>Also:

You said: &quot;EVERYONE hates cancer, what motive would they have to keeping this in the dark?&quot; 
Simple because Planned Parenthood and other abortion groups are making money off of abortion! An abortion can run from $400 to a few thousand, depending on the facility and how far the pregnancy is along. The same reason they would deny a link to breast cancer is the same reason they cover up sexual abuse, statutory rape, prostitution, sex trafficking of children, parental consent law violation, and why they present wrong medical information about the effects of abortion as well as about the pregnancy itself : They are making money off the bloody industry of abortions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also:</p>
<p>You said: &#8220;EVERYONE hates cancer, what motive would they have to keeping this in the dark?&#8221; <br />
Simple because Planned Parenthood and other abortion groups are making money off of abortion! An abortion can run from $400 to a few thousand, depending on the facility and how far the pregnancy is along. The same reason they would deny a link to breast cancer is the same reason they cover up sexual abuse, statutory rape, prostitution, sex trafficking of children, parental consent law violation, and why they present wrong medical information about the effects of abortion as well as about the pregnancy itself : They are making money off the bloody industry of abortions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hovish13</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-13128</link>
		<dc:creator>Hovish13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=976#comment-13128</guid>
		<description>But instead of funneling money toward abortion, we should be creating organizations that 1. support women who cannot afford/do not want a baby all the way through their pregnancy and then 2. connect them to parents who want to adopt their baby. And, I think it&#039;s safe to say that 100% of Americans would be okay with donating used baby toys, clothes, etc to such organizations rather than to sketchy organizations like Planned Parenthood. This means, less abortion, and financial support for pregnant women, and a means for placing the child for adoption. While there are a lot of problems in the foster care program, by creating a culture of life in America, I think a lot of people would think, &quot;If this baby is not adopted, it will be aborted.&quot; and step up to be a parent.

Regardless of whether or not abortion is connected to breast cancer, it has been proven to be connected to other health problems like infertility, psychological problems, even death etc. So even if breast cancer never turns out to be a result, there are still plenty of medical reasons for ending abortions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But instead of funneling money toward abortion, we should be creating organizations that 1. support women who cannot afford/do not want a baby all the way through their pregnancy and then 2. connect them to parents who want to adopt their baby. And, I think it&#8217;s safe to say that 100% of Americans would be okay with donating used baby toys, clothes, etc to such organizations rather than to sketchy organizations like Planned Parenthood. This means, less abortion, and financial support for pregnant women, and a means for placing the child for adoption. While there are a lot of problems in the foster care program, by creating a culture of life in America, I think a lot of people would think, &#8220;If this baby is not adopted, it will be aborted.&#8221; and step up to be a parent.</p>
<p>Regardless of whether or not abortion is connected to breast cancer, it has been proven to be connected to other health problems like infertility, psychological problems, even death etc. So even if breast cancer never turns out to be a result, there are still plenty of medical reasons for ending abortions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-12930</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=976#comment-12930</guid>
		<description>Have you ever been in that situation before? Obviously not. Over 80% of women who have abortions end up with severe mental health issues. I can speak from experience because I was one of those women and I made the wrong decision. I will never hold my baby in my arms and honestly, I will never get past it. It haunts me every single day of my life and my child would have recently turned 4 yrs old. I have shut everyone out of my life and now I am completely alone. Not a day goes by that I am not reminded that I am responsible for the death of my child and the most recent time that I tried to take my own life was within the past 2 months. Before becoming pregnant, I was popular and had a wonderful, carefree life with a fun job bartending and and even managing a bar/restaurant in the beach city where I live on the Atlantic Ocean. Today, I go through times where I refuse to leave the house because I don&#039;t want to be seen in public and by no means am I exaggerating when I say that, other than my mother, I have no friends whatsoever. I&#039;m 28 years old and my days consist of watching time go by without me. In a little over 2 weeks,I will be spending my 4th birthday alone crying and heartbroken. The only solution I have been able to come up with that would make any of this better is if I were able to go back in time and make the right decision. I think you should seek out the truth from those who have been in this situation and ask them how they feel about their choices because, like you said, it is dangerous to make sweeping judgements or legislation about this issue, which is coincidentally what happened when abortion was legalized. Drop the sarcasm, this is real life, a life my child will never experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever been in that situation before? Obviously not. Over 80% of women who have abortions end up with severe mental health issues. I can speak from experience because I was one of those women and I made the wrong decision. I will never hold my baby in my arms and honestly, I will never get past it. It haunts me every single day of my life and my child would have recently turned 4 yrs old. I have shut everyone out of my life and now I am completely alone. Not a day goes by that I am not reminded that I am responsible for the death of my child and the most recent time that I tried to take my own life was within the past 2 months. Before becoming pregnant, I was popular and had a wonderful, carefree life with a fun job bartending and and even managing a bar/restaurant in the beach city where I live on the Atlantic Ocean. Today, I go through times where I refuse to leave the house because I don&#8217;t want to be seen in public and by no means am I exaggerating when I say that, other than my mother, I have no friends whatsoever. I&#8217;m 28 years old and my days consist of watching time go by without me. In a little over 2 weeks,I will be spending my 4th birthday alone crying and heartbroken. The only solution I have been able to come up with that would make any of this better is if I were able to go back in time and make the right decision. I think you should seek out the truth from those who have been in this situation and ask them how they feel about their choices because, like you said, it is dangerous to make sweeping judgements or legislation about this issue, which is coincidentally what happened when abortion was legalized. Drop the sarcasm, this is real life, a life my child will never experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-12929</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=976#comment-12929</guid>
		<description>what kind of person is in favor of giving a death sentence to the most innocent victim of a horrible crime? The rapist cannot be sentenced to death, but it&#039;s ok for that sentence to apply to an innocent, defenseless child??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what kind of person is in favor of giving a death sentence to the most innocent victim of a horrible crime? The rapist cannot be sentenced to death, but it&#8217;s ok for that sentence to apply to an innocent, defenseless child??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-12406</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=976#comment-12406</guid>
		<description>Babies are in high demand by parents unable to have kids of thier own. its just part of our culture that &quot;the younger the better&quot; is pretty common when it comes to adoption. so you can raise them completely how you want. no previous emotional problems or anything like that. so the demand is different with babies than it is with children in the fostercare system. i agree that kids with out parents is horrible. but i see it as more horrible the murder of innocent unborn unnamed humans by those who should love them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Babies are in high demand by parents unable to have kids of thier own. its just part of our culture that &#8220;the younger the better&#8221; is pretty common when it comes to adoption. so you can raise them completely how you want. no previous emotional problems or anything like that. so the demand is different with babies than it is with children in the fostercare system. i agree that kids with out parents is horrible. but i see it as more horrible the murder of innocent unborn unnamed humans by those who should love them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elise</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-10543</link>
		<dc:creator>Elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 07:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=976#comment-10543</guid>
		<description>Hmm okay I looked at some of your sites and yes, they claim there is data that supports a link. The reason I say &quot;claim&quot; is because I&#039;m not sure if I trust theses sites.  For example one the sites was actually contacted by the American Cancer Society for posting an outdated statement and claiming it was still true today. The note that siate made on that correspondence is below--&gt;

On July 7, 2000 a paralegal in the Office of Corporation 
Counsel at the national home office of the American Cancer Society e-mailed 
our Coalition and made the following request:We 
recently noticed that you posted outdated American Cancer Society information 
(1996 Cancer Facts and Figures) on your web site regarding the effects of 
abortion on breast cancer. We would appreciate if you would delete this 
information since not (sic) longer current and may be misleading to the 
public.

If you wish to post Society information regarding this topic, 
please post the following: “Induced abortion: A large, recent study from Denmark 
has provided very strong data that induced abortions have no overall effect on 
the risk of breast cancer. Also, there is no evidence of a direct relationship 
between breast cancer and spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) in most of the 
studies that have been published.”
The American Cancer Society pretty clearly says that there is no evidence of a direct relationship.  I can see why it might happen in most cases but the ACS claims that overall there is no link.  Honestly I have no reason not to believe them (one of your sites claimed they are lying to us) and also see no reason why they withhold this type of info.  EVERYONE hates cancer, what motive would they have to keeping this in the dark? I&#039;m inclined to believe the ACS but I guess all that conflicting info leaves me at a point where maybe I can&#039;t form an opinion without looking at the lab data myself.  

As for the foster care thing:  I realize that it&#039;s an intensive process but I&#039;m sure there are not 200,000 or so people waiting for their forms to get through.  There are honestly too many kids without proper homes.  

As for birth control--&gt;  Okay sure I can see where you are coming from.  In SOME instances birth control will stop an egg that has already been fertilized.  I guess my opinion of when a baby becomes a baby is not the same as yours.  To me a fertilized egg is just a fertilized egg on track to form a baby but not a baby yet.  I&#039;m not sure when I would draw the line, maybe once the cells start differentiating.

As for your last point: I guess we have different definitions of &quot;birth control&quot; or at least different conotations.  While you look at with such disdain I guess I can see the neccesity.  Some people are not in the right place to have a baby.  Maybe they had a one night stand.  Maybe they are a teenager.  Maybe they are extremely poor or homeless.  Babys are blessings, yes, but they also come with A LOT of responsibilty and some people can&#039;t handle that.  Again, does this give the mother the right to decide whether he child lives or not?  I&#039;m not sure about that answer.  That is THE question.  But I do know that no mother does it flippantly or often.  No mother looks at abortion like their birth control pill.  No mother decides to do that without a lot of thought.  It&#039;s an emotional process and I can understand why some woman would make that choice.  So yes, I guess a lot of women use it for &quot;birth control&quot; but that might not neccesarily be as bad as you think it is. Honestly, it really has everything to do with the context in which a woman decides to have an abortion. 

And you might say well why not adoption, and again with so many kids in foster/group homes not everyone would want to put a kid through that experience.  I know several kids that are emotionally screwed up due to being in foster homes.        </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm okay I looked at some of your sites and yes, they claim there is data that supports a link. The reason I say &#8220;claim&#8221; is because I&#8217;m not sure if I trust theses sites.  For example one the sites was actually contacted by the American Cancer Society for posting an outdated statement and claiming it was still true today. The note that siate made on that correspondence is below&#8211;&gt;</p>
<p>On July 7, 2000 a paralegal in the Office of Corporation<br />
Counsel at the national home office of the American Cancer Society e-mailed<br />
our Coalition and made the following request:We<br />
recently noticed that you posted outdated American Cancer Society information<br />
(1996 Cancer Facts and Figures) on your web site regarding the effects of<br />
abortion on breast cancer. We would appreciate if you would delete this<br />
information since not (sic) longer current and may be misleading to the<br />
public.</p>
<p>If you wish to post Society information regarding this topic,<br />
please post the following: “Induced abortion: A large, recent study from Denmark<br />
has provided very strong data that induced abortions have no overall effect on<br />
the risk of breast cancer. Also, there is no evidence of a direct relationship<br />
between breast cancer and spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) in most of the<br />
studies that have been published.”<br />
The American Cancer Society pretty clearly says that there is no evidence of a direct relationship.  I can see why it might happen in most cases but the ACS claims that overall there is no link.  Honestly I have no reason not to believe them (one of your sites claimed they are lying to us) and also see no reason why they withhold this type of info.  EVERYONE hates cancer, what motive would they have to keeping this in the dark? I&#8217;m inclined to believe the ACS but I guess all that conflicting info leaves me at a point where maybe I can&#8217;t form an opinion without looking at the lab data myself.  </p>
<p>As for the foster care thing:  I realize that it&#8217;s an intensive process but I&#8217;m sure there are not 200,000 or so people waiting for their forms to get through.  There are honestly too many kids without proper homes.  </p>
<p>As for birth control&#8211;&gt;  Okay sure I can see where you are coming from.  In SOME instances birth control will stop an egg that has already been fertilized.  I guess my opinion of when a baby becomes a baby is not the same as yours.  To me a fertilized egg is just a fertilized egg on track to form a baby but not a baby yet.  I&#8217;m not sure when I would draw the line, maybe once the cells start differentiating.</p>
<p>As for your last point: I guess we have different definitions of &#8220;birth control&#8221; or at least different conotations.  While you look at with such disdain I guess I can see the neccesity.  Some people are not in the right place to have a baby.  Maybe they had a one night stand.  Maybe they are a teenager.  Maybe they are extremely poor or homeless.  Babys are blessings, yes, but they also come with A LOT of responsibilty and some people can&#8217;t handle that.  Again, does this give the mother the right to decide whether he child lives or not?  I&#8217;m not sure about that answer.  That is THE question.  But I do know that no mother does it flippantly or often.  No mother looks at abortion like their birth control pill.  No mother decides to do that without a lot of thought.  It&#8217;s an emotional process and I can understand why some woman would make that choice.  So yes, I guess a lot of women use it for &#8220;birth control&#8221; but that might not neccesarily be as bad as you think it is. Honestly, it really has everything to do with the context in which a woman decides to have an abortion. </p>
<p>And you might say well why not adoption, and again with so many kids in foster/group homes not everyone would want to put a kid through that experience.  I know several kids that are emotionally screwed up due to being in foster homes.        </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Queen_penguin422</title>
		<link>http://liveaction.org/blog/polling-data-americas-youth-becoming-pro-life/comment-page-1/#comment-10521</link>
		<dc:creator>Queen_penguin422</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liveaction.org/blog/?p=976#comment-10521</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m still waiting to hear your reply to both of my responses below, I have found more information for you (there is just so much overwhelming evidence of the medical risks of abortion that there are so many articles and studies to provide links to). I have been the the American Cancer Society&#039;s website and investigated your quote. While they say that there MAY be some problems with studies that have linked abortion to breast cancer, they do not say that there is definitely NOT a connection. 

You should also know that all scientific studies are prone to error... not just ones related to the abortion/breast cancer link. For example, a few years back, there was a study on whether homosexuality is related to a person&#039;s biology (implying that maybe people are &quot;born this way&quot;) and they claimed to find a link between something in the brains of professing homosexuals that favored this idea. However, looking at the information and data provided, even scientists who weren&#039;t against homosexuality said the studies were completely biased and that they found virtually nothing that could relate biology to homosexuality. My point is that whenever a single study like this is done, you are going to find people who say that the study shows something and you will find people who say it shows nothing. 

However, there have been an overwhelming amount of studies implicating that abortion raises risks for breast cancer and the explanation for it does make a lot of sense (see what I wrote two responses down where I countered your first argument, &quot;#1. When a woman is pregnant, cells in her breast begin to multiply rapidly...&quot;). Also, I have been to the Breast Cancer Prevention website and they claim that there most definitely IS a link between abortion and breast cancer. Go to http://www.bcpinstitute.org/resources.htm and there is an entire section of resources and brochures on the abortion breast cancer link. One good one in particular is http://www.bcpinstitute.org/brochure.htm . 27 out of 33 studies done from 1957-2000 have shown that abortion is related to an increased risk and 17 of those 27 show a SIGNIFICANT risk.

Another good link is http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/The_Link.htm and I encourage anyone who is skeptical about the abortion breast cancer link to read it thoroughly. Towards the end, they list reasons why women are not being told this information and why some anti-cancer societies will deny any links between the two. Most of the reasons include being financially supported by pro-choice feminist organizations like Planned Parenthood. If you were being given loads of money by these organizations, would you dare to turn your back on them and imply to the public that the very &quot;healthcare&quot; they defend could be a risk factor for cancer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m still waiting to hear your reply to both of my responses below, I have found more information for you (there is just so much overwhelming evidence of the medical risks of abortion that there are so many articles and studies to provide links to). I have been the the American Cancer Society&#8217;s website and investigated your quote. While they say that there MAY be some problems with studies that have linked abortion to breast cancer, they do not say that there is definitely NOT a connection. </p>
<p>You should also know that all scientific studies are prone to error&#8230; not just ones related to the abortion/breast cancer link. For example, a few years back, there was a study on whether homosexuality is related to a person&#8217;s biology (implying that maybe people are &#8220;born this way&#8221;) and they claimed to find a link between something in the brains of professing homosexuals that favored this idea. However, looking at the information and data provided, even scientists who weren&#8217;t against homosexuality said the studies were completely biased and that they found virtually nothing that could relate biology to homosexuality. My point is that whenever a single study like this is done, you are going to find people who say that the study shows something and you will find people who say it shows nothing. </p>
<p>However, there have been an overwhelming amount of studies implicating that abortion raises risks for breast cancer and the explanation for it does make a lot of sense (see what I wrote two responses down where I countered your first argument, &#8220;#1. When a woman is pregnant, cells in her breast begin to multiply rapidly&#8230;&#8221;). Also, I have been to the Breast Cancer Prevention website and they claim that there most definitely IS a link between abortion and breast cancer. Go to <a href="http://www.bcpinstitute.org/resources.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.bcpinstitute.org/resources.htm</a> and there is an entire section of resources and brochures on the abortion breast cancer link. One good one in particular is <a href="http://www.bcpinstitute.org/brochure.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.bcpinstitute.org/brochure.htm</a> . 27 out of 33 studies done from 1957-2000 have shown that abortion is related to an increased risk and 17 of those 27 show a SIGNIFICANT risk.</p>
<p>Another good link is <a href="http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/The_Link.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/The_Link.htm</a> and I encourage anyone who is skeptical about the abortion breast cancer link to read it thoroughly. Towards the end, they list reasons why women are not being told this information and why some anti-cancer societies will deny any links between the two. Most of the reasons include being financially supported by pro-choice feminist organizations like Planned Parenthood. If you were being given loads of money by these organizations, would you dare to turn your back on them and imply to the public that the very &#8220;healthcare&#8221; they defend could be a risk factor for cancer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

