States File Lawsuit Against HHS Mandate

In addition to earlier lawsuits by small religious collegesindividuals, and non-profit organizations, seven states have filed a law suit against the HHS contraception, sterilization, and abortifacient mandate.

The attorney generals of Texas, Florida, Michigan, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma and South Carolina filed a joint lawsuit in Nebraska’s US District Court yesterday.

The attorney generals are asking the Court to declare the mandate unconstitutional, as it violates the religious freedom’s of their state’s citizens.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott argued that:

“Obamacare’s latest mandate tramples the First Amendment’s Freedom of Religion and compels people of faith to act contrary to their convictions. The President’s so called ‘accommodation’ was nothing but a shell game: the mandate still requires religious organizations to subsidize and authorize conduct that conflicts with their religious principles. The very first amendment to our Constitution was intended to protect against this sort of government intrusion into our religious convictions.”

The Obama administration had no comment (as of press time) about the lawsuit.

His buddy Rachel Maddow, however,  had the follwing to say on her blog:

In all likelihood, the lawsuits are intended to make the right feel better, and perhaps give the relevant players a boost in fundraising. For that matter, the courts are occasionally unpredictable, and these conservative lawyers may feel like it’s worth rolling the dice.

But if precedent and common sense win out, these lawsuits more closely resemble publicity stunts than legitimate legal challenges.

But those who oppose the mandate, such as Louisiana College President Joe Aguillard, view this as a fight for their very REAL morals, rights, and consciences, ““This mandate is a violation of our first amendment rights and we will not stand for it. There will be no compromise. We will go to jail if that’s what it takes but we’ve put our foot down.”

The National Clergy Council, a group that represents Catholic, Protestant, Evangelical and Orthodox leaders has declared a “state of emergency” for religious institutions, and delivered a statement to President Obama at the White House on Ash Wednesday. The statement, which members of the council say was inspired by Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the German pastor and martyr who worked to resist the Nazis, reaffirms the groups belief in the sanctity of life, and urges Obama to work to protect religious freedom in America.

  • Pingback: Friday Roundup 2/24/12 Who Cares if Rubio Spent Part of His Childhood as a Mormon Edition

  • http://twitter.com/stanchaz stan chaz

    These “faith-based institutions” are businesses NOT churches….BIG businesses. Their varied employees should  not be made to involuntarily kneel at the altar of religion… a flat-out violation of the First Amendment. The government is trying to protect the freedom of these employees, not to limit it! Seriously: The bottom line is that absolutely NO ONE is coming into our Churches or places of worship and telling believers what to believe…..or forcing them to use contraception. BUT If the Bishops (and other denominations) want to continue running businesses outside of their places of worship…businesses that employ millions of people of varying faiths -or no “faith” at all- THEN they must play by the same rules and rights that other workers live by and enjoy (especially if their businesses use our tax dollars, and skip paying taxes, in the process). If the Jehovah’s Witnesses church hires me, can they alter my health insurance to exclude blood transfusions? Even worse- what if they operated a hospital by their “rules”? This is not a “war on religion”. Never was. However, it IS a war BY some religions… on women and men who simply want to plan their families, to control their futures, to keep their jobs, and to have health insurance that allows them to do that. 

    • Hovish13

      Oh please. Some of us just have consciences about our moral beliefs, and don’t want to pay for those beliefs to be violated. Just because sOme people feel entitled to certain preventative “medicines” like birth control doesn’t mean I should have to violate my conscience and that unimportant thing called the first amendment. If you don’t like the policy of a catholic/christian/muslim/ hindu insurance program, you have the ability to purchase that specific insurance separately. And remember, just because your insurance wouldn’t be able to GET a blood transfusion. You would just have to pay for it yourself

      . This isn’t even about access tO “health care”- its about Obama trying to make the right wingers look like anti women religious bigots for the upcOming election. They’re losing on abortion, so logically they’re moving on to the issue of contraception.

      • Hovish13

        *you’re insurance wouldn’t cover it doesn’t mean you wouldn’t be able to have a blood transfusion.

        • 12angry_men

          Well the whole point of the insurance is so that you don’t have to pay for it, as some people can’t afford to