Skip to main content
Live Action LogoLive Action
pro-life Isabel Vaughan-Spruce

Legal win for pro-life activist arrested for silent prayer

Icon of a scaleHuman Rights·By Victoria Bergin

Legal win for pro-life activist arrested for silent prayer

Pro-life activist Isabel Vaughan-Spruce has gained a legal win in her ongoing battle over the freedom to pray silently outside of an abortion business.

Vaughan-Spruce, Director of the UK March for Life, was first arrested in December 2022 for standing outside of an abortion business and admitting that she might be silently praying. She is just one victim of increasingly strict laws to protect abortion facilities in the UK. The police said she was in violation of a Public Health Protection Order (PHPO) which bans “protesting, namely engaging in any act of approval or disapproval or attempted act of approval or disapproval, with respect to issues related to abortion services, by any means” near abortion facilities. “This includes but is not limited to graphic, verbal or written means, prayer or counseling,” the order reads.

The charges against Vaughan-Spruce were dropped, but shortly after, she was arrested again in March for the same reason, even though her actions were previously deemed innocent. Around that time, Parliament introduced even stricter legislation banning pro-life activity around abortion businesses, including silent prayer.

Target petition

In addition to being banned from the area around the abortion facility where she was arrested, her bail conditions banned her from other public spaces as well. The UK division of Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF UK) is representing Vaughan-Spruce, and argued that these conditions were “unnecessary” and “disproportionate.” They won and the conditions were lifted. These bail conditions were able to be enforced so easily because police are allowed to restrict access for nine months on their own authority, without an order from the court.

Article continues below

Dear Reader,

Have you ever wanted to share the miracle of human development with little ones? Live Action is proud to present the "Baby Olivia" board book, which presents the content of Live Action's "Baby Olivia" fetal development video in a fun, new format. It's perfect for helping little minds understand the complex and beautiful process of human development in the womb.

Receive our brand new Baby Olivia board book when you give a one-time gift of $30 or more (or begin a new monthly gift of $15 or more), and your gift will be DOUBLED to fuel Live Action’s life-saving content.

For now, Vaughan-Spruce is permitted to be near her local abortion business once again. While this is a win, the fight is not over for Vaughan-Spruce and other pro-life advocates in the UK who have faced similar persecution. The case was sent to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and it is still considering whether to prosecute Vaughan-Spruce.

A timeline of the case can be found here.

Did you know that as little as $10 a month is enough to reach more than 3,000 people with the truth about abortion that no one else is telling them? Click here to start saving lives 365 days a year.

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Read Next

Read NextInuit mother Keira Alexandra Kronvold, 38, look on during an interview with AFP on May 5, 2025 in Copenhagen. Keira Alexandra Kronvold's baby daughter Zammi was only two hours old when Danish social workers separated her from her mother, an Indigenous Inuit woman deemed unfit to raise the child after a contested parental aptitude test. Danish authorities have previously faced backlash for an experiment that took Greenlandic children from their families in the 1950s to socialise them in Denmark, and for forcing thousands of Inuit women to use IUD contraceptive devices from the 1960s to 1990s.
International

Greenlandic victims of Denmark's 'parenting tests' still don't have their children back

Cassy Cooke

·

Spotlight Articles