Skip to main content

We are urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly supporters) before the end of October to help save babies from abortion 365 days a year. Your first gift as a Life Defender today will be DOUBLED. Click here to make your monthly commitment.

Live Action LogoLive Action
Physician Wearing Stethoscope

Language matters: Pro-life medical group releases medical glossary

Icon of a paper and pencilGuest Column·By Sam Entile

Language matters: Pro-life medical group releases medical glossary

(Pregnancy Help News) In an effort to promote “optimal healthcare for both pregnant woman and preborn children,” the American Association of Pro Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG) has issued a “Glossary of Medical Terms for Life-Affirming Medical Professionals.”

“In this post-Dobbs environment, it is critical for life-affirming medical professionals to utilize language that is scientifically accurate,” said Dr. Donna Harrison, board-certified OBGYN and AAPLOG’s director of research. “In order for women to have true informed consent it is essential that they be given accurate information about the humanity of the preborn, the intent of induced abortion, and the difference between induced abortion and medically indicated maternal-fetal separations.”

“The pro-abortion American College of OB-GYNs (ACOG) obscures these facts in their own recently-published “Guide to Language and Abortion,” Harrison said, “encouraging terminology that dehumanizes the preborn and euphemizes induced abortion.”

ACOG’s March 2022 language guide claims to be “without bias.” However, its language recommendations do not necessarily reflect medical science. For example, it stresses to use such language as “medication abortion” instead of “chemical abortion,” even though the abortion pill does not medicate any illness.

The AAPLOG glossary recognizes this and recommends avoiding the term “medication abortion” to refer to the abortion pill regimen.

The glossary states: “medication implies that an illness is being treated and that there is therapeutic benefit.”

Because pregnancy is not an illness, the glossary recommends alternate language such as “intentional embryocide by chemical agent” or “intentional feticide via mifepristone.”

This recommendation is especially timely in light of an ongoing court case against the FDA, which fast-tracked the abortion drug mifepristone on the false grounds that it treated a “serious or life-threatening illness.”

The ACOG guide also delves into political language.

It suggests using the term “abortion” instead of “elective abortion” or “abortion on-demand,” even though the latter terms provide more information as to the circumstances under which politicians are promoting abortion.

The AAPLOG glossary recommends the term “intentional feticide” instead of “abortion.”

Further clarification is also recommended, depending on the method used. For example, the glossary suggests “Intentional feticide by chemical agent,” “Intentional feticide by vacuum disruption,” “Intentional feticide by dismemberment,” etc.

Dear Reader,

Every day in America, more than 2,800 preborn babies lose their lives to abortion.

That number should break our hearts and move us to action.

Ending this tragedy requires daily commitment from people like you who refuse to stay silent.

Millions read Live Action News each month — imagine the impact if each of us took a stand for life 365 days a year.

Right now, we’re urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly donors) to join us before the end of October. And thanks to a generous $250,000 matching grant, your first monthly gift will be DOUBLED to help save lives and build a culture that protects the preborn.

Will you become one of the 500 today? Click here now to become a Live Action Life Defender and have your first gift doubled.

Together, we can end abortion and create a future where every child is cherished and every mother is supported.

Thumbnail for Abortion Procedures: 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Trimesters

“ACOG’s language not only prevents women from receiving true informed consent but also has profound effects on the discourse on abortion in our nation, even influencing the language that journalists use to report on this issue,” said Harrison.

“ACOG is so committed to a pro-abortion ideology that they are using their influence to sow confusion and fear among Americans, ultimately harming those we are sworn to serve: our patients,” Harrison said. “Our glossary presents an effort to restore sanity to the public conversation and encourage pro-life medical professionals to practice according to their values.”

Another recommendation AAPLOG issued in the glossary is to use the term “fertilization” instead of “conception” because the latter “has been redefined as beginning with implantation.”

The idea that conception doesn’t occur until implantation is a relatively recent shift. In 2011, Reuters reported that 57 of 100 doctors in a survey affirmed that pregnancy begins at “conception.” At the time, ACOG propagated for a definition that pregnancy began at “implantation.”

Language changes have had real world impact.

A related change occurred in December 2022. The manufacturer of Plan B One Step successfully lobbied the FDA to disguise language about the drug’s effect on “implantation,” which they considered a “barrier” for consumers to use the product. The manufacturer effectively admitted that women do not want to take a product that will abort a baby even between fertilization and implantation. Using “fertilization” instead of “conception,” as AAPLOG recommends, can help clarify that one is not referring to implantation.

The language battleground not only permeates the medical and political arenas, but also media.

In December 2022, the Associated Press released guidelines that effectively served as language propaganda for the abortion industry, some of which echoed ACOG’s March 2022 recommendations.

The AP instructed journalists to use “anti-abortion” centers instead of “pregnancy resource centers,” use “anti-abortion” instead of “pro-life,” use “cardiac activity” instead of “heartbeat,” and avoid the phrase “late-term abortion.”

Language manipulation has long been a hallmark of abortion proponents. Even in the 1960s, ACOG betrayed the Hippocratic Oath by changing the definition of “therapeutic” to open the door for elective abortions.

Decades of specious language steering in favor of the abortion industry, including multiple renewed efforts in the last year, highlights the importance of the AAPLOG glossary today.

Editor’s Note: This article was published at Pregnancy Help News and is reprinted here with permission.

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Read Next

Read NextPedestrians cross a street near a billboard with a poster with the lettering reading 'Where are these children?' in Warsaw, on August 5, 2022. - The billboards, put up in recent weeks by a Catholic foundation, are hard to miss: large and plastered all over Poland, they show two little blonde girls in immaculate white posing in a wheat field -- along with the alarmist caption, "Where are these children?" Falling birth rate statistics displayed alongside in the form of a pictogram claim that the average Polish family had five children in the 1950s, down to three in the 80s and 1.5 today.
International

Poland implements income tax incentives for families

Bridget Sielicki

·

Spotlight Articles