Planned Parenthood of the Heartland’s regional director Todd Buchacker told ABC News in an article published today about chemical abortions via remote connection:
“It may be more time-consuming over the course of a few days, as opposed to a 10-minute clinical procedure, but it is more personal and private and some women — I hate to say this — say it feels it is more natural.”
While chemical abortions do result in the delivery of a whole a dead child compared to the tearing used in a surgical vacuum aspiration procedure, I don’t see how that makes a man-induced process any more natural.
Question: Do you think chemical abortions are “more natural” than surgical abortion?
