However, DCF allegedly revoked its foster care licenses for the families due to their refusal to sign off on DCF’s sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression policy.

READ: A conversation with Mrs. Universe on foster care misconceptions and how pro-lifers can help

“The Department recently decided to exclude all families with traditional religious beliefs about human sexuality from fostering or adopting any child,” the lawsuit reads. “This ideological campaign puts politics above people and gender ideology over children’s best interests. It is harmful, unnecessary, and unconstitutional.”

The policy states, “The caregiver’s beliefs and attitude about the child’s sexual or gender identity, as well as the caregiver’s behaviors and actions that may stem from their beliefs or attitude, will be carefully considered when identifying dangers and risks in cases involving LGBTQ youth. Family services workers should consider whether: • The child or youth is fearful of their parent/caregiver or others living in the residence; • The caregiver is verbally hostile when talking to or about the child; • The caregiver has not, will not, or is unable to provide care and supervision necessary to protect the child from harm, including self-harm; or • The caregiver is verbally abusive to the child, ostracizes the child, ridicules, or belittles the child.”

While the policy appears to focus on children who have already expressed an LGBTQ identity or gender dysphoria, DCF has allegedly refused to allow the two couples to foster even if the child is a relative, a newborn, or needs a safe home for just a day.

After DCF sent an email last year stating that families must support a child’s wish to change his or her gender, the Gantts told DCF that they could not ignore their religious beliefs. Likewise, in 2022, the Wuotis told DCF that they could not do or say anything against their religious views on sexuality. DCF revoked the licenses of both couples, despite the shortage of foster homes in the state.

Vermont DCF has had to place some children with unlicensed families, hospitals, and police stations due to the lack of available foster homes, yet it will not place children with licensed parents who have worked with DCF for years.

“Although the Wuotis and Gantts have adopted five children between them, the Department has determined they are unfit to foster or adopt any child solely due to their religiously inspired and widely held belief that girls cannot become boys or vice versa,” states the lawsuit. “Vermont would prefer children have no home than to place them with families of faith with these views.”

In a similar case in 2023, an Oregon woman sued the state after it rejected her adoption application because she would not promise to transition hypothetical children experiencing gender dysphoria.

The DOJ put a pro-life grandmother in jail for protesting the killing of preborn children. Please take 30-seconds to TELL CONGRESS: STOP THE DOJ FROM TARGETING PRO-LIFE AMERICANS.

However, DCF allegedly revoked its foster care licenses for the families due to their refusal to sign off on DCF’s sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression policy.

READ: A conversation with Mrs. Universe on foster care misconceptions and how pro-lifers can help

“The Department recently decided to exclude all families with traditional religious beliefs about human sexuality from fostering or adopting any child,” the lawsuit reads. “This ideological campaign puts politics above people and gender ideology over children’s best interests. It is harmful, unnecessary, and unconstitutional.”

The policy states, “The caregiver’s beliefs and attitude about the child’s sexual or gender identity, as well as the caregiver’s behaviors and actions that may stem from their beliefs or attitude, will be carefully considered when identifying dangers and risks in cases involving LGBTQ youth. Family services workers should consider whether: • The child or youth is fearful of their parent/caregiver or others living in the residence; • The caregiver is verbally hostile when talking to or about the child; • The caregiver has not, will not, or is unable to provide care and supervision necessary to protect the child from harm, including self-harm; or • The caregiver is verbally abusive to the child, ostracizes the child, ridicules, or belittles the child.”

While the policy appears to focus on children who have already expressed an LGBTQ identity or gender dysphoria, DCF has allegedly refused to allow the two couples to foster even if the child is a relative, a newborn, or needs a safe home for just a day.

After DCF sent an email last year stating that families must support a child’s wish to change his or her gender, the Gantts told DCF that they could not ignore their religious beliefs. Likewise, in 2022, the Wuotis told DCF that they could not do or say anything against their religious views on sexuality. DCF revoked the licenses of both couples, despite the shortage of foster homes in the state.

Vermont DCF has had to place some children with unlicensed families, hospitals, and police stations due to the lack of available foster homes, yet it will not place children with licensed parents who have worked with DCF for years.

“Although the Wuotis and Gantts have adopted five children between them, the Department has determined they are unfit to foster or adopt any child solely due to their religiously inspired and widely held belief that girls cannot become boys or vice versa,” states the lawsuit. “Vermont would prefer children have no home than to place them with families of faith with these views.”

In a similar case in 2023, an Oregon woman sued the state after it rejected her adoption application because she would not promise to transition hypothetical children experiencing gender dysphoria.

The DOJ put a pro-life grandmother in jail for protesting the killing of preborn children. Please take 30-seconds to TELL CONGRESS: STOP THE DOJ FROM TARGETING PRO-LIFE AMERICANS.