Guest Column

The Supreme Court’s chance to get the science right

Supreme Court

(Pregnancy Help News) For the first time in fifty years, the Supreme Court has been asked directly to overturn Roe v. Wade, the decision which took away the ability of the American people to protect preborn human beings.[1] The scientific information available to the Supreme Court in Roe was based primarily on the medical imagination of Justice Blackmun, who was neither a scientist nor a physician, but who relied on his own research to determine facts about preborn human beings, which was pivotal in the Courts decision to refuse to allow states to protect their preborn children.  

And despite the patently absurd claim by Justice Sotomayor during the oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that nothing has changed in medicine over the last 30 years regarding fetal pain, [2] the scientific reality is that fetuses at 15 weeks exhibit the same physiological reactions to pain[3] that Justice Sotomayor would experience: withdrawal from painful stimuli, increase in heartrate, etc. That is why when we operate on a fetus, that fetus is given separate anesthesia and the fetuses who have anesthesia do better than fetuses without anesthesia. The science is clear. The court has no excuse any longer to deny the reality of the human being in utero.

READ: AP photo labels pro-life doctors as ‘anti-abortion protesters wearing doctors uniforms’

What was also clearly presented to the court is the information about the harms of abortion to women.[4] Fifty years of abortion in America has left a disaster of increasing preterm birth[5], increasing mental health problems including suicide, drug abuse and depression[6], and increasing breast cancer[7] in women who abort and subsequently delay bearing children.

And for the first time, the scientific and medical evidence regarding the harms of abortion was presented directly to the Supreme Court. We hope they don’t choose to ignore the facts. And the facts all point to one decision: The Supreme Court needs to catch up with the science and allow the people to decide for themselves. Roe must go.

PHN Editor’s Note: Donna Harrison M.D. is the Chief Executive Officer of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG). 

LAN Editor’s Note: This article was published at Pregnancy Help News and is reprinted here with permission.

[1] https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health-organization/
[2] https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2021/19-1392_gfbi.pdf page 17-19
[3] https://aaplog.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/PG-2-Fetal-Pain.pdf
[4] https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/185350/20210729163532595_No.%2019-1392%20-%20American%20Association%20of%20Pro-Life%20Obstetricians%20and%20Gynecologists%20-%20Amicus%20Brief%20in%20Support%20of%20Petitioner%20-%207-29-21.pdf
[5] https://aaplog.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/PB-5-Overview-of-Abortion-and-PTB.pdf
[6] https://aaplog.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/FINAL-Abortion-Mental-Health-PB7.pdf
[7] https://aaplog.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/FINAL-CO-8-Abortion-Breast-Cancer-1.9.20.pdf

“Like” Live Action News on Facebook for more pro-life news and commentary!

What is Live Action News?

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective. Learn More

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

GUEST ARTICLES: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated. (See here for Open License Agreement.) Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!



To Top