Kamala Harris argues there should be zero compromises or limits to abortions in America.... NBC’s @HallieJackson: “So, as a question of pragmatism then, what concessions would be on the table? Religious exemptions, for example? Is that something you would consider if Republicans

Kamala Harris says ‘concessions’ for ‘religious exemptions’ shouldn’t be made for abortion
Kamala Harris says ‘concessions’ for ‘religious exemptions’ shouldn’t be made for abortion
A new interview with Vice President Kamala Harris has raised eyebrows among those who value their First Amendment rights as Americans.
In a recent interview with NBC’s Hallie Jackson, Harris was asked if there were any restrictions on abortion that she would accept. “So, as a question of pragmatism then, what concessions would be on the table?” Jackson asked. “Religious exemptions, for example? Is that something you would consider if Republicans control Congress?”
Harris replied, “I don’t think we should be making concessions when we’re talking about a fundamental freedom to make decisions about your own body.” She further added:
“I’m not going to engage in hypotheticals because we could go with a variety of scenarios. Let’s just start with the fundamental fact. A basic freedom has been taken from the women of America: the freedom to make decisions about their own body. And that cannot be negotiable, which is that we need to put back in the protections of Roe v. Wade, and that is it.”
So the essential argument being made here appears to be that no one should have the right to refuse to participate in abortion — not even under the defense of religious freedom, religious exemption, or of conscience rights. Would this mean that in a Harris administration, religious groups will be forced to pay for the killing of preborn children through their insurance plans, for example, despite their clear opposition to it? Would this mean a doctor who refuses to participate in committing abortions (exercising his or her own ‘bodily autonomy’ in choosing not to take life) would be banned from practicing under the Harris administration?
I am on @NRO @KamalaHarris needs to make it clear what conscience rights for health care professionals she opposes Does she oppose the Church Amendments? Does she want to make health care professionals perform abortions against their will? nationalreview.com/corner/what-co…
While Harris doesn’t specifically say, these concerns are very real. After all, the Little Sisters of the Poor, a group of Catholic nuns, had to fight all the way to the Supreme Court for their right to refuse a mandate to cover contraception — something to which they are religiously opposed. And multiple religious groups are currently appealing to the Supreme Court because of New York’s abortion coverage mandate.
Forcing medical professionals to participate in abortion isn’t far fetched; a large number of OB/GYNs are unwilling to commit abortions. If, for all intents and purposes, OB/GYNs are required to commit them, even if it violates their religious freedom, the number of abortionists would either increase… or those morally opposed to abortion could leave their careers altogether.
Religious freedom has long been considered one of the nation’s most inalienable rights. As Live Action News previously explained:
Thomas Jefferson wrote, “[O]ur rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God.”
Similarly, James Madison, considered the Father of the Bill of Rights, understood:
[I]f man cannot be loyal to himself, to his conscience, then a government cannot expect him to be loyal to less compelling obligations, including rules, statutes, judicial orders, and professional duties. If the government demands that he betray his conscience, the government has eliminated the only moral basis for obeying any law.
Earlier this year, a federal judge blocked a federal mandate requiring employers to accommodate abortion. The Supreme Court has also upheld religious freedom rights regarding abortion and contraception in the past.
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!
Read Next

When abortion advocates mimic life-affirming care
Andrea Trudden
·More In Newsbreak

Guest Column
When abortion advocates mimic life-affirming care
Andrea Trudden
·
Abortion Pill
California lawmakers pass bill to hide all information from abortion pill prescriptions
Bridget Sielicki
·
International
An already scandal-ridden IVF industry now faces fraud allegations
Nancy Flanders
·
Politics
NIH pledges not to renew grants for research using aborted babies
Nancy Flanders
·
Investigative
People on the street answer: 'Is sex-selective abortion ok?'
Bridget Sielicki
·More From Cassy Cooke

International
Victoria's 'assisted dying' program overloaded, yet leaders push for more deaths
Cassy Cooke
·
International
Paralympian receives abuse and harassment for opposing assisted suicide
Cassy Cooke
·
Eugenics
EXCLUSIVE: How IVF and surrogacy have led to consumer eugenics
Cassy Cooke
·
Human Interest
'Heartbroken': Country star's 29-week preemie died in her parents' arms
Cassy Cooke
·
Politics
New York AG to personally intervene as Texas attempts to prosecute abortionist
Cassy Cooke
·