Skip to main content

We are urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly supporters) before the end of October to help save babies from abortion 365 days a year. Your first gift as a Life Defender today will be DOUBLED. Click here to make your monthly commitment.

Live Action LogoLive Action
Oregon State v Stanford

Sandra Day O’Connor, first female Supreme Court Justice, has died

Icon of a megaphoneNewsbreak·By Nancy Flanders

Sandra Day O’Connor, first female Supreme Court Justice, has died

Former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the first woman appointed to the United States Supreme Court, has died at age 93.

Though appointed to the court by pro-life President Ronald Reagan in 1981, just eight years following the Roe v. Wade decision, and considered a “constitutional conservative,” O’Connor was a pivotal player in keeping abortion legal despite claiming to be personally pro-life. In 1992, she co-authored the court’s decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which upheld Roe and created a new benchmark for abortion laws. Following Casey, any pro-life law could be invalidated if it imposed an “undue burden” on women.

Casey centered around a 1989 Pennsylvania law that placed a 24-hour waiting period on abortion, required minors to get parental consent for an abortion, and established informed consent requirements. It also required married women to notify their spouse if they planned to have an abortion. Despite O’Connor’s personal opposition to abortion, in Casey, she argued that requiring husbands to be notified of an abortion put a “substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability.”

Casey could have been the case that overturned Roe or even recognized that there is a right to life, law professor Mary Ziegler told Vox in 2018. Instead, Casey upheld Roe and created confusion over what qualifies as an ‘undue burden’. Ziegler explained, “[Casey] in many ways not only changed the law, but gave both sides a road map for what they would want to do going forward.”

Thumbnail for The Pro-Life Reply to: "I'm Personally Pro Life, BUT..."

O’Connor was, however, skeptical of Roe‘s use of trimesters as the benchmark for legalized abortion, saying that it was akin to “asking courts to make medical decisions.” Before Casey, O’Connor dissented from the 1983 pro-abortion Supreme Court opinion in City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, in which she criticized Roe‘s trimester and viability standards for legalized abortion.

Dear Reader,

Every day in America, more than 2,800 preborn babies lose their lives to abortion.

That number should break our hearts and move us to action.

Ending this tragedy requires daily commitment from people like you who refuse to stay silent.

Millions read Live Action News each month — imagine the impact if each of us took a stand for life 365 days a year.

Right now, we’re urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly donors) to join us before the end of October. And thanks to a generous $250,000 matching grant, your first monthly gift will be DOUBLED to help save lives and build a culture that protects the preborn.

Will you become one of the 500 today? Click here now to become a Live Action Life Defender and have your first gift doubled.

Together, we can end abortion and create a future where every child is cherished and every mother is supported.

“The Roe framework,” she wrote in her dissent, “is clearly on a collision course with itself. As the medical risks of various abortion procedures decrease, the point at which the state may regulate for reasons of maternal health is moved further forward to actual childbirth. As medical science becomes better able to provide for the separate existence of the fetus, the point of viability is moved further back toward conception.”

In June 2022, the Court overturned both Roe and Casey in its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

“It is challenging to be a ‘first,'” O’Connor wrote in her 2013 history of the Supreme Court. “The first woman on the Court was carefully scrutinized by the press, the government, the lawyers, and the public,” she said. “It is not always comfortable to be the object of so much attention. But the appointment of a woman to the Court opened countless doors to women all across the country. For that I am grateful.”

O’Connor stepped down from the court in 2005 following her husband’s diagnosis of Alzheimer’s. She, herself, announced she would withdraw from public life in 2018 after her own diagnosis with dementia.

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Read Next

Read NextPlanned Parenthood
Issues

Judge: Planned Parenthood can ignore Trump's EO on gender ideology

Victoria Bergin

·

Spotlight Articles