Skip to main content
Live Action LogoLive Action
Satanic Temple case, pro-life, abortion law, Planned Parenthood

Satanic Temple lawsuit to overturn Missouri abortion laws is dismissed

Icon of a megaphoneNewsbreak·By Cassy Cooke

Satanic Temple lawsuit to overturn Missouri abortion laws is dismissed

For years, the Satanic Temple has been trying to have abortion laws in Missouri overturned. In 2015, a plaintiff under the alias of “Mary Doe” filed a lawsuit objecting to Missouri’s 72-hour waiting period and informed consent law, with the case heard before the Missouri Supreme Court in 2017. Doe claimed this law violated her “religious freedom,” arguing:

As you know, state law requires a waiting period after I first receive counseling before I can undergo an abortion. I regard a waiting period as a state sanctioned attempt to discourage abortion by instilling an unnecessary burden as part of the process to obtain this legal medical procedure. The waiting period interferes with the inviolability of my body and thereby imposes an unwanted and substantial burden on my sincerely held religious beliefs.

This letter constitutes my acknowledgment that you have notified me of the state mandated waiting period, but demands that you do not abide by this obligation because the waiting period offends my sincerely held religious beliefs, which take precedent.

READ: Detroit Satanists stage pro-abortion demonstration against ‘fetishizing fetuses’

According to Lucien Greaves, co-founder of the Satanic Temple, abortion is a religious right for them. “As Satanists we believe in individual autonomy, personal choice, and the inviolability of one’s own body,” he said. “Further, we believe one should be free to make one’s own decisions, uncoerced, based on the best available scientific evidence, whether or not the science comports with the religious and/or political views of others.”

The Western District of the Missouri Court of Appeals ruled in her favor earlier this month after the case was rejected by the Cole County Circuit Court. Now, however, a federal appeals court has thrown out the lawsuit, saying that Doe was not pregnant when she sued and therefore, “lacked constitutional standing.”

In addition to a 72-hour waiting period, Missouri law requires women to be given a booklet explaining fetal development, including that life begins at fertilization. It also requires women to be offered an ultrasound and the opportunity to hear the fetal heartbeat.

Thumbnail for Baby Development Week by Week

While this is a momentary victory for life, the Satanic Temple is not giving up on their crusade in support of abortion. There are still two more lawsuits pending on their behalf in Missouri. In these cases, the women were both pregnant when they filed. But Mary Compton, spokeswoman for Missouri Attorney General Josh Hawley, promised that Missouri will “continue to vigorously defend Missouri’s sensible waiting period law.”

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.

Our work is possible because of our donors. Please consider giving to further our work of changing hearts and minds on issues of life and human dignity.

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Read Next

Read NextPresentation Of The World's First Face Transplant From A Euthanised Woman BARCELONA CATALONIA, SPAIN - FEBRUARY 02: The medical team and the patient who received the transplant, at the Vall d'Hebron Hospital, on 2 February 2026, in Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. During the press conference, the professionals involved in the operation explained how the world's first face transplant from a donor who was euthanised was performed. (Photo By David Zorrakino/Europa Press via Getty Images)
Issues

Face of euthanized woman transplanted to another patient

Wesley J. Smith

·

Spotlight Articles