Slovenia recently held a referendum on legalizing assisted suicide, with 55% of voters in favor and 45% against. Although the vote is non-binding, the initiative could pave the way for the legalization of assisted suicide in the country.
“The outcome of the referendum gives the legislator a clear signal to legislate as soon as possible the right to voluntary end of life, which will prevent unnecessary suffering, without interfering in any way with the legal or factual position of those who intimately disagree with medical assistance in ending life,” claimed Srebrna nit, a pro-euthanasia organization, in a press release.
The press release continued, “We expect the publication of the rejected Srebrna nit proposal as a legal draft, on which comments can be made for improvements in a public hearing, to which everyone will be invited.”
Earlier this year, the Slovenian government defeated a bill that would have legalized assisted suicide. This bill had been proposed by an organization called Silver Thread, a “right-to-die” association, that collected signatures. Even though the bill was defeated, the government decided to hold a referendum on the subject to give the public a chance to weigh in after a Slovenian Public Opinion poll showed that 63.5% of over 1,000 respondents found assisted suicide acceptable, while only 17.4% found it unacceptable.
The referendum was initiated, and voters were asked to answer the question, “Are you in favor of adopting a law that will regulate the right to assistance in voluntary end of life?” The results showed that the majority of voters were in favor of the measure.
READ: Pope Francis calls for better palliative care, not assisted suicide: ‘Life is a right, not death’
But the move to legalize assisted suicide has many opponents, including the Slovenian Association of Catholic Doctors, which issued a statement before the vote, arguing that euthanasia undermines human dignity. The doctors expressed concern that vulnerable individuals might be exploited or pressured into ending their lives instead of receiving necessary care. The statement also highlighted the ethical dilemmas faced by healthcare workers who conscientiously object to participating in assisted suicide.
Instead, they advocated for high-quality palliative care as a compassionate alternative. The Slovenia Times reported in March that “palliative care is available in Slovenia, but it is widely seen as inadequate, and it is not equally accessible around the country.” This can become a problem in countries where medical assistance in dying is promoted, as well, like in Canada.
Additionally, the Slovenian National Medical Ethics Committee has been outspoken in its opposition to assisted suicide, stating that “euthanasia changes the cultural and civilizational tradition of our society and interferes with the relationship between physicians and patients, between the health sector and society.”
Despite public opinion, the medical profession in Slovenia has been widely against the legalization of assisted suicide, citing ethical concerns with the practice and noting the importance of doctors’ commitment to saving lives, not helping end them.
“We are against active killing of patients; in exchange, we offer good palliative care,” said Radko Komadina, head of the Slovenian Medical Association. Citing the World Medical Association, he noted, “it does not befit doctors to take part in killing or to kill.”
